Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The World Without NPR
Shout Bits ^ | 3/21/11 | Shout Bits

Posted on 03/26/2011 8:02:07 AM PDT by Shout Bits

Last week The House voted to defund NPR by cutting the Gordian ties between Washington and the radio network. A metaphor for everything Washington, nobody knows how much government nectar flows to NPR or in what form – estimates vary from $4MM to $90MM, not to mention its dubious tax exempt status. Sen. Harry Reid offered a typically pathetic defense of NPR by citing critical investigative reporting on dog racing. To be sure, NPR provides a left-leaning window into esoteric topics no other radio station covers, but time has passed NPR by. News sources like 24 hr. cable, blogs, and Sirius have made NPR hopelessly obsolete. Without government funding, NPR’s content could easily find a home on the internet or on Sirius. Why, then, does the left convulse at the thought of NPR’s defunding; why is a world without NPR unthinkable to statists?

The obvious answer to the left’s attachment to NPR is that it is a consistent voice for government. NPR uses government funds to report on opportunities to spend more government money. Statists and dictators have always had government propaganda outlets, and NPR serves this role comparatively benignly. NPR makes for fairly easy training in Becking a story (i.e. Internet searching the names of NPR guests to reveal that they are often radical revolutionaries and communists). Still, there is more to NPR appeal.

George Mason economics professor Daniel Klein published The People’s Romance, a paper on why people are so reluctant to give up even obviously worthless government programs. He presents several theories, including Adam Smith’s idea that people naturally seek to coordinate their sentiments, not just Pareto self-interest. Unlike talk radio and blogs, NPR is a one way flow of left wing sentiment; it coordinates the sentiments of its listeners. NPR is the left’s shaman telling his tribe the stories that define a cultural identity. Klein would argue that this collectivist instinct is part of what keeps government programs alive well past their logical termination.

Since NPR’s message and mission would surely continue without public funding, what difference does it make to the left? A $90MM program’s termination rarely makes the news, or draws the ire of the Senate Majority Leader. Who should care? Klein goes on to observe that capitalist entities are like clubs to which not everyone is invited, while government entities are perceived as The People’s Romance or belonging to the people. Even though capitalism provides more and better services than the government, non-investors feel a greater sense of ownership and kinship toward government programs. Defunding NPR will hurt nobody, but it goes against the sense of community at the heart of NPR’s admirers.

The concept of The People’s Romance sounds like communism because it is exactly that. At its heart, communism and collectivism offer less prosperity in exchange for a sense of safety. Collectivists often refer to the ‘Socialist Family,’ Orwell depicted ‘Big Brother,’ and Social Security is a ‘safety net.’ These terms are comforting, safe, and reliable. Socialism is stagnation, but also a false promise of security. Government waste and corruption is accepted because government poses as a substitute for family and community. These are the feelings that keep even the most obviously worthless government program intact decades after it ceases to serve the people.

People are easily lulled into collectivist delusions like NPR, but they are also resilient; they provide for themselves when there are no handouts. Once NPR is defunded, liberals will begin the painful adjustment of finding their news, entertainment, and tribal identity elsewhere. Eventually, as NPR’s defunding becomes a non-event, people will realize that there is life after government programs. Perhaps NPR will be a baby step toward reducing government’s role in more important areas. On the other hand, if NPR can’t be defunded, there is no hope for entitlement reform, or the elimination of larger, even more worthless departments.

Government programs like NPR are a comforting tonic for the collectivist instinct, and they are hard to abandon. Still, the road to restoring Washington’s financial viability starts with cutting even tiny programs like NPR because that is the way toward a US that is more individualist and self-reliant.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: npr; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-80 next last
links and citations are on the original blog page
1 posted on 03/26/2011 8:02:10 AM PDT by Shout Bits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits
Direct link

You should just excerpt your stuff.

2 posted on 03/26/2011 8:05:11 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

We’ve survived just fine without Err America. We can live without NPR too.


3 posted on 03/26/2011 8:06:16 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits
Statists and dictators have always had government propaganda outlets, and NPR serves this role comparatively benignly.

I would say it's blatently obvious they are a propaganda outlet. Anyone with half a brain can see their bias.

4 posted on 03/26/2011 8:10:16 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

I imagine that NPR will continue much as it is. They’ll just have to raise more money from their listeners and from progressive donors like Soros. The advantage to that change is that WE will no longer be forced to pay for it. And it will drain a few dollars out of the left’s vast coffers that would otherwise be spent on other leftist goals.


5 posted on 03/26/2011 8:11:11 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
I used to excerpt my articles, but I got some rather hateful flame from people who thought I was a ‘blog pimp.’ Lately, I have been posting the whole article, but delayed.

I write Shout Bits for free to advocate for free markets and less government. To do this, I want people to read it, which seems obvious to me. If that is ‘blog pimping,’ I don't see what is wrong with it.

I am sorry, but I am going to have to file this under ‘you can't please everyone.’

If anyone wants Shout Bits on the day it is published, feel free to subscribe either by RSS or email.

6 posted on 03/26/2011 8:11:41 AM PDT by Shout Bits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

$4MM to $90MM my a$$. More like $450,000,000.

Do your homework.


7 posted on 03/26/2011 8:11:52 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

That is assuming that the funding is actually cut. That hasn’t happened yet, and won’t, unless Boehner couples this with some bill that Obama has to sign.


8 posted on 03/26/2011 8:12:21 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

My problem with this whole debate, logically, is that the NPR defenders argue that “no federal funding” = “no NPR.” I don’t think that is the case. I think they would quickly make up the difference with corporate and foundation funding. Nothing would change.


9 posted on 03/26/2011 8:12:36 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

If NPR went of the air tomorrow, I wouldn’t know about it unless I read it here on FR.


10 posted on 03/26/2011 8:13:36 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey thug! I've got your "collective bargaining" right here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

Don’t take it personally. Someone is always complaining about something, the point in this case being that FR shouldn’t be used to fund people’s blogs.

No, I know, you were just explaining it.


11 posted on 03/26/2011 8:14:25 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

The error is in thinking that NPR is going to go away. Believe me, it will be funded; it just won’t be funded by federal tax dollars. Well-meaning, guilt-afflicted liberals, classical music devotees, and large left-wing organizations will continue to fund it. I have no fear that Mozart is going away.


12 posted on 03/26/2011 8:14:28 AM PDT by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7; humblegunner

?


13 posted on 03/26/2011 8:14:32 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits
You have a good blog.

Illegitimi non carborundum

14 posted on 03/26/2011 8:14:47 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

“Sen. Harry Reid offered a typically pathetic defense of NPR by citing critical investigative reporting on dog racing.”

Between this and the cowboy poetry, Reid needs to retire and visit a rubber room.


15 posted on 03/26/2011 8:15:42 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (The most dangerous place on the face of the earth is between a liberal and their money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits
Very nicely written - clear, concise and well-argued.

I clicked on your blog when I was done, just to give you a hit.

I don't really get the bizarre mouth-foaming anti-blog faction here anyway.

16 posted on 03/26/2011 8:19:28 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

Buh-bye!


17 posted on 03/26/2011 8:21:10 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; Shout Bits
Someone is always complaining about something, the point in this case being that FR shouldn’t be used to fund people’s blogs.

What are you talking about? FR is used to "fund" people's blogs

18 posted on 03/26/2011 8:22:08 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
$450MM is several times NPR’s total revenues. As my article states, nobody knows how much government money NPR takes in because it comes from so many different sources such as CPB, grants, and money from NGOs that launder government money.

I did my homework.

19 posted on 03/26/2011 8:22:47 AM PDT by Shout Bits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits
I sure hope the classic-music portion of NPR continues with private funding. The problem of going commercial is almost certainly these stations will become bland, pop-culture shows like we already have: mostly yaking, contests, and little snippets of classical pieces because anything longer will lose the paying audience.

Bland radio as well as TV is attributable to the FCC. Government defunding of NPR doesn't solve the problem but defunding the FCC does. Until the FCC is dissolved, the government will continue to interfere with communications free-market supply and demand which would bring us robust, innovative and delightful shows (the golden age of radio before the FCC forced their pablum on America).

20 posted on 03/26/2011 8:23:34 AM PDT by Jim 0216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7; Shout Bits; Cicero
What are you talking about? FR is used to "fund" people's blogs

I've had to go toe-to-toe with VIRULENT jerkoffs who have a thing for what they call "blog pimps".

Check out some of "humblergunner's" choice work. You'll usually find his "crew" with him when they're ganging up on FReepers they label as "blog pimps".

21 posted on 03/26/2011 8:34:54 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Islamic law upholds that children born to a Muslim father are automatically Muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Illegitimi non carborundum


22 posted on 03/26/2011 8:39:46 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

There’s a whack job in every crowd.


23 posted on 03/26/2011 8:41:41 AM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

The “blog pimp police” are as irritating (or more) as the blog pimps. Worse than the spelling/grammar nazis. I’ve yet to see anyone forced to click a thread, much less its link.


24 posted on 03/26/2011 8:44:21 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
they're ganging up on FReepers they label as "blog pimps".

We'll sometimes take a swipe at pimp enablers. too.

25 posted on 03/26/2011 8:44:45 AM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

“If NPR went of the air tomorrow, I wouldn’t know about it unless I read it here on FR.”

Wouldn’t you miss “All Liberal Things Considered”? LOL.


26 posted on 03/26/2011 8:49:31 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I know. People will get on a thread they know they will hate just for the joy of abusing it. There’s so much to read on Free Republic ... if you hate blogs, don’t read it.

Some people just post long, looooong, replies to threads that are longer than most blogs.

Get over it, everyone.


27 posted on 03/26/2011 8:50:52 AM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

As it should be. If the left wants their own forum to spew alternative views, let THEM fund it. To paraphrase Billy Joel, ...you can speak your mind/but not on my dime...


28 posted on 03/26/2011 8:51:51 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner


29 posted on 03/26/2011 8:57:04 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; All
"The “blog pimp police” are as irritating (or more) as the blog pimps. Worse than the spelling/grammar nazis. I’ve yet to see anyone forced to click a thread, much less its link."

OOOOOOHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sounds like you speak from experience, my young Jedi....

How many blogs have you had zotted, and under how many different names??

If you have a severe case of unresolved butt hurt that has never been properly dealt with; so I urge you to fill out this form, be as complete and thorough as you can, and forward it to a nice person here at Free Republic who goes by the name of "Admin Moderator".

If you are convincing enough, I'm certain that Admin Moderator will discipline those naughty "blog police" you speak of, and maybe even include some of the "Pimpbusters" too. If you can be particularly convincing, maybe Admin Moderator will banish some of those old meanie-pants and show them all a thing or two, just for you.

Good Luck, be sure to print it out and use both sides if you need to...




30 posted on 03/26/2011 8:57:46 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Agreed. And if they don't, good riddance.

When “children are starving in the streets” it is ridiculous to be funding NPR, PBS, NEA....

31 posted on 03/26/2011 9:04:37 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dead; Shout Bits
I don't really get the bizarre mouth-foaming anti-blog faction here anyway.

Excerpting and linking to poorly written blogs that exist only to pump up the author's ego are annoying. Linking to well written, informative blogs is providing a service.

I say Shout Bits is providing a service by posting his article this way. We can read the whole thing and visit and subscribe if we want to without being forced to hit the blog only to find out that it stinks.

32 posted on 03/26/2011 9:04:52 AM PDT by Chuckster (When I was a kid, this was a free country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

33 posted on 03/26/2011 9:06:39 AM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Many public station that program classical music are not getting that programming from NPR.

Tons of classical music available on sat radio and the net.


34 posted on 03/26/2011 9:10:36 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Don't click here
35 posted on 03/26/2011 9:11:15 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
We'll sometimes take a swipe at pimp enablers. too.

I wondered where you got that bloody nose. It's got to hurt, punching yourself in the face...

36 posted on 03/26/2011 9:12:27 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Islamic law upholds that children born to a Muslim father are automatically Muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

A world without NPR? I don’t even know of it on a daily basis. I refuse to get my news from any biased source such as NPR.


37 posted on 03/26/2011 9:13:54 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henry Hnyellar
Many public station that program classical music are not getting that programming from NPR

So maybe I'll get my wish and the non-pop classic music portion will remain?

Tons of classical music available on sat radio and the net.

I usually listen when I'm driving - does satellite radio escape the stupidity of the FCC?

38 posted on 03/26/2011 9:15:34 AM PDT by Jim 0216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits; humblegunner; Tribune7; Chuckster; an amused spectator; altura; EDINVA
Please continue to post all of your fine comments in toto. If people tell you to excerpt, they're not doing you any favors. Jim Robinson has given specific delegation and instructions with regard to the handling of bloggers (we like 'em) and blog pimps (we don't).

Delegation

Rules

P.S. I have subscribed to your blog. It's nice to take off my Grammar Police and Pimpbuster hats and just read without distractions.

39 posted on 03/26/2011 9:31:09 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

NPR will get by on their corporate contributions.


40 posted on 03/26/2011 9:36:21 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady; Shout Bits; humblegunner; Tribune7; Chuckster; an amused spectator; altura; EDINVA
and blog pimps (we don't).

Some blog pimps are OK

41 posted on 03/26/2011 9:58:02 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator; Tribune7; Shout Bits

I think it cuts both ways. Nobody objects to links to an established and interesting blog, like Iowahawk for instance.

There is some reason to object to someone posting a useless blog, just in order to get hits and possible fans.

Clearly it’s hard to draw the line between a blog that really deserves to be linked and one that is just searching for fame. So on occasion I find myself on one side of the argument, and sometimes on the other.

At least if you post the whole thing, people can decide for themselves before they start providing hits to the blog.


42 posted on 03/26/2011 9:58:34 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits
Agree with every point you make in the piece. Beating the socialists is no small thing because they've managed to tap into such primal stuff -- feelings of family, security, safety, etc. Socialism is the true opium of the masses, which is ironic. And of course since it's fundamentally a way to avoid and deny the difficult reality of life on planet Earth rather than to deal with it, it's a false choice and will generally result in more suffering.
43 posted on 03/26/2011 10:00:38 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7; Shout Bits; humblegunner; Chuckster; an amused spectator; altura; EDINVA
Some blog pimps are OK

Please, before you embarrass yourself further, acquaint yourself with the excerpt list.

44 posted on 03/26/2011 10:04:20 AM PDT by TheOldLady ("The Long Knives of Sallegroldladeo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
There is some reason to object to someone posting a useless blog, just in order to get hits and possible fans.

And you're right. Posting a single line would be serious pimping.

But if someone should post three or four paragraphs one should be able to tell if the blogger was serious, literate and providing useful information; and, of course, clicking to the blog would be a quite appropriate payment for work well done.

And, of course, if it's garbage, it's a lot better to read the three graphs on FR and know than to actually have the whole unfathomable story on FR.

45 posted on 03/26/2011 10:04:50 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

I appreciate that you posted the entire thing. I think it was very well written.


46 posted on 03/26/2011 10:05:02 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
So if a blog pimp is on the excerpt list -- i.e. he is someone who has threatened to sue FR -- it's OK??
47 posted on 03/26/2011 10:07:21 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Shout Bits

Excuse me, possibly just for NPR. The entire public broadcasting behemoth has revinues in the several billions.

Is it just NPR that irritates you?


48 posted on 03/26/2011 10:07:42 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator; Shout Bits
I've had to go toe-to-toe with VIRULENT jerkoffs who have a thing for what they call "blog pimps".

Shout Bits has a well-written blog.

Shout Bits posts material on FR in its entirety.

Shout Bits has my respect as a blogger.

Blog pimps post what is usually poorly written material or they purloin pieces or videos from other authors and put them on their own blogs, sometimes passing them off as their own.

Then they needlessly excerpt their blog on FR for the sole purpose of drivng traffic to their sites to obtain blog hits.

Shout Bits is not a blog pimp.

49 posted on 03/26/2011 10:09:05 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Darlin' you've been here for ten years, and you're asking me to make you understand these simple concepts and copyright laws? I'm an old woman, not a miracle worker.

Here's Free Republic, spread out before you like a feast, and all you have to do is the tiniest bit of easy research to learn all you need to know, and right from the Home Page.

Of course, common sense would probably help a lot too.

50 posted on 03/26/2011 10:33:54 AM PDT by TheOldLady ("The Long Knives of Sallegroldladeo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson