Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The F-Bomb
Surviving California ^ | 12/3/2010 | Bobbo

Posted on 12/03/2010 9:19:18 PM PST by DoctorZIn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: survivingcalifornia
Okay, I love the term but what does “blog pimping pictures” mean?


61 posted on 12/04/2010 6:24:43 AM PST by houeto ("You know, I actually believe my own bullsh_t," --- BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn

Are there conservative wimmen on this blog and do they have whiskey?


62 posted on 12/04/2010 6:32:43 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/brack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: survivingcalifornia

Good writing. Nice Blog.

Welcome.


63 posted on 12/04/2010 7:31:40 AM PST by KDD (When the government boot is on your neck, it matters not whether it is the right boot or the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fee; Chunga85

Wells Fargo claims the notes are lost.. but in actuality they are held at various “Iron Mountain” locations,, completely free of all the necessary assignments involved in creating an investment instrument. Every MBS they created is a LIE , the docs were never delivered to the trustees.

Bank of America is similarly screwed , their “record custodian” testified recently that Countrywide NEVER ransferred the loan docs to the various trusts ...

The robo signers are just one tiny piece of evidence of the fraud.. The FED and Fannie/Freddie all know that the hand they’re holding is unenforceable at best and in most cases is plain old fraud.


64 posted on 12/04/2010 8:33:30 AM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: survivingcalifornia

If the original note can’t be found, does that mean I can’t sell and transfer title? Am I stuck here forever?


65 posted on 12/04/2010 8:38:51 AM PST by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller

Hold on.... the mods just don’t like people who show up and pimp their blog and don’t otherwise interact.

Maybe we need a specific definition of blog pimping.

I wasn’t saying they were doing that. I was saying watch out and don’t do that.

Sheesh.


66 posted on 12/04/2010 9:12:36 AM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

When I “refinanced” with Wachovia around 2002 (it was actually a new loan because we owned free and clear at that point), Wachovia came back and told us we didn’t have clear title, but they were going to make the loan and close the deal anyway. They said there would be some kind of special clause added to the title insurance. It seemed like a ho-hum snafu, but I needed to clear things up with my old lender. Being told I didn’t have clear title annoyed me.

I made some calls to my (paid-off) mortgage servicer, Atlantic Mortgage, and was told that I needed to talk to ABN AMRO. I finally pushed enough buttons on my phone to get ahold of somebody named Alyson Wright, and was told that they had received the unrecorded satisfaction piece I had mailed to them the previous week and would send it to my county for recording. (I have no idea why I had an unrecorded satisfaction piece, but I believe it was sent to me by Atlantic shortly after we made our final payment.) She told me it would take ~90 days for them to get the paperwork rolling because they have “a microfilm process”. It could then take the county 3 months or so to get the now-recorded “satisfaction piece” back to me.

My new loan with Wachovia was closed and so I forgot all about it (but I kept my file and notes and copies of EVERYTHING for future reference, of course). About 9 months later I received a recorded satisfaction piece in the mail. God only knows whatever happened to the original note. I recall thinking that all parties involved were confused in general, and maybe overwhelmed by the sheer volume of new business. Wachovia’s nonchalance about closing my very favorable (for me) mortgage despite a cloud on my title left me thinking that all these banks must be swimming in the same cesspool.

I have since refinanced that Wachovia loan with somebody else and there (apparently) is no longer any issue with my title.


67 posted on 12/04/2010 9:43:06 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
There's a pretty active thread on FR about everyone's panties suddenly in a bunch over "Wiki-Leaks" releasing "secret" info about big banks ripping off everyone possible.

Yawn.

FR Wiki Thread

68 posted on 12/04/2010 9:54:34 AM PST by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: visualops

I hope that we can get over this and still be cyber friends. After all, at Ronald Reagan said: Wat do you call someone who believes 80% of what you do? I call them ‘friend’.

BTW, I am a rule follower too. No worries.


69 posted on 12/04/2010 11:14:07 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

That is why the NOTE IS EVERYTHING. It is physical and therefore needs to have a physical note and recording. There is a reason for why the system works a specific way.

After the 60’s, do the Boomers still insist on changing every system they come in contact with? And in so doing, collapse those very systems when they ‘realize’ there were reasons for the system being a certain way? When will we Boomers learn?


70 posted on 12/04/2010 11:14:12 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Your tagline says it ALL. I wish I would have thought of it.


71 posted on 12/04/2010 11:14:58 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bert

Thanks. I already like it here. The people are very knowledgable.


72 posted on 12/04/2010 11:15:01 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: visualops
Thanks for the help. I will do that. I think the good Doctor just wanted to make a splash. Stirring the pot is much more fun and it gets you a little more PR then just doing everything “by the book”. He hasn't told me that was his idea but I have my suspicions
73 posted on 12/04/2010 11:15:52 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Thanks for the validation. This really is a problem. So far the idea has been to just sweep it under the rug and follow a liberal idea of kinda following the rules.

What really pisses me off is that these perps were making huge sums of money. It’s not like somehow the money wasn’t there to do this right by following the rules.


74 posted on 12/04/2010 11:15:56 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: houeto

OH MY LORD!!!

i(sic) love it.

Thanks for letting me know.

That will keep a smile on my face all day.


75 posted on 12/04/2010 11:15:59 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: KDD

Thank you. I am truly humbled by everyones positive comments


76 posted on 12/04/2010 11:16:03 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

?No one knows for sure. However, no, you aren’t stuck there forever.

It may take awhile to get the ‘cloud’ of title straigthened out. But if you have a normal, non-distress sale (not a short sale, foreclosure, etc.) there won’t be a problem because none of the parties will make an issue of it.

Where this is really playing out is the foreclosure market. If people don’t buy foreclosures it drags the market much lower. Remember, the worse thing for ANY market is insecurity. And right now, the biggest category of homes for sale has a huge dark cloud over it. Not good for real estate.


77 posted on 12/04/2010 11:16:05 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Danae

FYI, thats how I took it...that you were looking out for me.

Thanks.


78 posted on 12/04/2010 11:16:09 AM PST by survivingcalifornia (ultra-newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Danae
the mods just don’t like people who show up and pimp their blog and don’t otherwise interact.

Oh, rilly? Please share mods' other likes / dislikes. It would surely make for fascinating reading

79 posted on 12/04/2010 12:25:33 PM PST by don-o (Wait. What?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
2002 was a little before my time with ABN AMRO, can't say much about your experience with them. Are you sure they were the mortgage holder or originator and not the servicer? ABN AMRO did alot of mortgage servicing for other banks in addition to their own origination.

I left ABN AMRO in March 2007, literally the Friday before they were sold to B of A. ABN's mortgage servicing systems were considered industry leading and ABN AMRO had a very clean mortgage portfolio that was sold to CitiBank as ABN AMRO was being broken up and sold into pieces. From a risk perspective, ABN AMRO never not into the high-risk loans or mortgage backed securities business, mostly because the damn' Dutch were too stodgy and slow to take advantage the booming mortgage market.

That and a little 'money laundering' case that Elliot Spitzer was holding over the Bank along with a cease and decist order stopping ABN AMRO from doing alot of business here in the U.S.

At the end I guess I'm not surprised it took all those months for you to receive your paperwork and satisfaction piece, nice to know the old microfiche systems that we relied on as the archive of last resort still worked. I'm guessing your initial mortgage initiated somewhere in the mid to late 70's based on the fact they had to go back to the original fiche and didn't have the images online yet. I'm also guessing it was right near the tail end of the retention requirements for the bank to retain your paperwork which is why they never transferred your records from microfiche to image? Just a guess ....

80 posted on 12/04/2010 12:43:51 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson