Reasonable conservatives should be able to disagree about Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, LDS, NRA or any other high profile person or organization without throwing around accusations of being a troll.
I don't see the attacks on Glenn Beck as being anywhere close to reasonable. If taking cheap shots his struggle with alcoholism, denigrating his message on 8/28, ignoring the contributions to the Special Operations Warrior Fund doesn't qualify someone to troll status, I don't know what does.
I've witnessed more garbage directed at Beck for his rally than I've seen for the charade of Sharptons rally here on FR. Frankly, that's sick and disgusting. Idiots on this Forum that have more in common with Chris Matthews than with Glenn Beck should embrace being called trolls.
So, questioning Mr. Beck’s behaviour renders one a troll, as does postulating that the same challenges that led Mr. Beck to become an alcoholic could also lead him to other problem behaviours? That causes a person to be branded a troll?