Creator, not designer.
The rough draft of my miniature essay. I would like feedback.
The scientific community has mistakenly called self-ordering phenomena, self-organize. A self-ordered phenomenon is not to be confused with self-organize. Self organization and self-ordered should be thoroughly examined to correct the current paradigm. Many scientific papers have been published presupposing self-organization, which has never been observed.
Stand-alone physicodynamics has never been observed to give rise to sophisticated formal function nor a formal utility of any kind, yet many scientist hold the metaphysical belief that stand-alone physicodynamics can give rise to sophisticated formal function. Self-ordering events are in accordance with physical law; no known law has been observed to give rise to formal self-organization, laws do the same thing every time: they are forced behaviors, they do not program at any level, nor generate the organization, coordination, and cooperation required by complex formal function. When we, as humans, organize something, we do it with a choice in mind and not mere chance. Organization does not take place, in the absence of someone making the correct choices. Randomness of physical elements cannot self-organize, however, they can self-order.
One of the requirements of organization is true decision nodes at every level, pre-programming is required to make the correct choices. All know life is cybernetic, yet self-ordering, limited by physical laws, are not capable of cybernetic programming, program for a potential function, control and regulate integrated formal functions, produce prescriptive information, or manifest utility, and other characteristics of complex functioning biological machines. In other words, self-ordering events do nothing useful, there is no goal, only self-organization is able to do these.
We cannot self-organize ourselves internally, we only find ourselves already organized internally. Self-organization cannot happen in accordance with physical law, because physical laws of themselves do nothing. Self-organization can only take place if free from physical laws; natural forces do not make choices with intent, a requirement of formal self-organization, but even free of physical constraint does not program any kind of sophisticated formal function.
The current paradigm is what most scientists believe, not what is true. Most scientists believe self-organization has been observed, but in reality self-order is being observed. Self-ordered phenomenon is physicodynamic, not formal. When you do something, such as building a car; you are instantiating your thoughts (non-physical) in the physical world; formal choices are being instantiated in a physical matrix, which is not determined by natural laws. Physical law will not built the car, it is only when you make the choice and intend to carry out that decision, will the car be built. Self-organization requires freedom from constraints of natural laws, and is always the result of choice with intent.
Physical elements cannot bona fide self-organization into a formal functioning biological systems. How can this happen considering formal choices are instantiated into a physical matrix by someone who makes a choice with the intent to carry out that decision? How does self-ordering constrained by physical law account for complex biofuntion?