Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fichori
I've had to duck-n-cover before, myself. The posts are vicious and over-reactive. It's folly to even mention a belief differing from the "loudest" group.

Arguing FAITH is silly; and since no one is going to change his/her beliefs over the threads, they seem counter-productive--unless the "product" is self-gratification.

200 posted on 05/03/2008 8:58:34 PM PDT by bannie (clintons CHEAT! It's their only weapon.; & Barry/Barack has two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: bannie
"Arguing FAITH is silly; and since no one is going to change his/her beliefs over the threads, they seem counter-productive--unless the "product" is self-gratification." [excerpt]

I think the same could be said about crevo threads.

Unfortunately, those who are just looking for a dogfight make it impossible to have a serious debate.

Fortunantly on the crevo threads, the WikiMods mostly stick to enforcing common decency.
201 posted on 05/03/2008 9:34:31 PM PDT by Fichori (FreeRepublic.com: Full speed ahead on the road to Wikipediaism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson