The "real" federal prosecutor scandal. Dems use it to steal the next election.

There appears to be a coordinated effort on the part of Democrats and their media allies to prevent investigation of voter fraud by US attorneys.

Reasons for the firing of 8 US Attorneys have varied. Some, like Carol Lam, were ousted for failure to pursue cases against illegal immigrants. Others, like John McKay and David Inglasias were fired for failure to pursue voter fraud.

Voter fraud, unlike many other crimes, strikes at the very heart of our system of government. We do not need to be reminded of the closeness of recent elections for the very highest offices from President to Governors to Senators and Representatives.

It will not do for the Democrats in congress to make it politically impossible to bring voter fraud charges. It will not do for the partisan press (read NY Times) to dismiss charges of widespread voter fraud and voter intimidation as non-problems when it suits their ideological purposes.

Liberal outcry is because it can be turned AGAINST Bush through clever propaganda and revealing ONLY the wanted (pro-liberal/anti-Bush) cliff notes of the affair.

Thus, Clinton/Reno's role in their wholesale firings is ignored and discounted, while the role of the FAILURE of these attorney general to investigate/prosecute vote fraud is denied.

Follow the money, follow the power.

This seems to be it in a nutshell.

President Bush should be sending a shot across the bow that this garbage of refusal to prosecute has got to stop.

Clinton fired all 93 District Attorneys so they wouldn't prosecute. I am convinced of that.

With all the garbage clinton did, while in office, what else can one assume?

It will not do for the Democrats in congress to make it politically impossible to bring voter fraud charges. It will not do for the partisan press (read NY Times) In partisan Republican circles, the pursuit of voter fraud is code for suppressing the votes of minorities and poor people. to dismiss charges of widespread voter fraud and voter intimidation as non-problems when it suits their ideological purposes.

You want code? I'll give you code. In partisan Democratic circles (and there is no other kind of Democratic circle):

opposition to democracy is "Democratic,"

government is "society" or "the public sector,"

Civl Rights is opposition to the civil rights of white Americans,

objective journalism is the self-interested criticism and second guessing of anyone who threatens to earn credit with the public for actually doing something significant or important,

liberalism or progressivism is the idea that criticism and second guessing of anyone who threatens to earn credit with the public for actually doing something significant or important is objective,

. . . and the list goes on.

On the issue of the partisanship of the press, the press presumptively is partisan. But then, broadcasting is censored, so broadcast journalism cannot be considered part of "the press" under the First Amendment.

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.