Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATO faces its last chance in Kandahar
WESTHAWK ^ | February 10, 2006 | Westhawk

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:44:41 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

The fragile North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has steeled itself to face its fate. It has volunteered to take over responsibility from U.S. Central Command the task of pacifying the Taliban’s south Afghanistan stronghold of Kandahar and its surrounding provinces. There is no doubt that some, perhaps many, European and Canadian soldiers will die in combat there in the months and years ahead. This warning comes from an anonymous source on the ground in Afghanistan (from the Financial Times):

"When Nato troops arrive [in the south] they will be facing much worse conditions than this time last year," said a western security source in Afghanistan. "Nato forces have very different operating styles from the US troops and this is something that the Taliban will be waiting to take advantage of."

The arrival of European and Canadian soldiers into smoldering Kandahar and its environs will set up a perfect opportunity for Islamists everywhere, not just the Taliban, to bruise and embarrass the thought-to-be weak European and Canadian troops. The Islamists will plan to play the leftist European and Canadian media like a merry fiddle, shock and demoralize their publics back home, and make their political classes squirm and then break. The Islamists’ goal will be to break whatever remains of Western unity once and for all and thus isolate the United States from any hope of support from the remains of the West.

The Islamic beneficiaries of such an outcome would range far beyond the Taliban in Kandahar. Breaking the will of European and Canadian politicians and citizens to confront problems in the Islamic world would boost the fortunes of Mr. Bashar Al-Assad, the Iranian mullahs, the Hamas gang in Palestine, Sunni diehards in Iraq, and the list goes on. This is why Kandahar may become the latest magnet for Islamist fighters, and the newest flashpoint between the West and Islam.

Some of the best of NATO soldiery, the British, the Dutch, and the Canadians, will lead the new campaign in south Afghanistan. An Islamic victory over these troops will therefore be even more crushing to the future relevancy of NATO. NATO may be coming to pacify south Afghanistan. But if the Islamists succeed in running up the body count, demoralizing Europe and Canada, and forcing CENTCOM to retake the area, it will be the Islamists that will have pacified NATO, turning it into nothing more than a European jobs program.

The Europeans and Canadians know all of these consequences and they have signed up for the duty anyway, when they could just as well have left Kandahar with the Americans. This decision has been in the works for over a year. All have known the stakes and have pushed ahead. The Dutch parliament in particular had a long, open, but contentious debate on the matter. In the end, Dutch parliamentarians from all sides of the political spectrum approved the deployment of 1400 soldiers to the upcoming British-led operation in the south.

The current agitation over the “Cartoon Wars” is the most recent and glaring example of Europe trying to steady itself in the face of Islamic jabs. But the Dutch, the British, and the Canadians made their decisions about going to Kandahar before the Cartoon War erupted. In this sense, perhaps the Europeans and Canadians have known for some time that they needed take a stand. In preparation for this test, NATO has toughed its rules of engagement in Afghanistan.

Kandahar may not end up as the Battle of Stalingrad, but for Islamists that wish to isolate the U.S. from the West, one can see why they would wish to make it so, at least as a metaphor. What is even more interesting is that Europe and Canada have signed up for this test of wills too, knowing in advance how costly their retreat would be.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; canadiantroops; isaf; kandahar; nato; oef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
WESTHAWK
1 posted on 02/11/2006 4:44:44 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive; fanfan; NorthOf45

ping


2 posted on 02/11/2006 4:45:30 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; ...

Canada Ping!

Please FReepmail me to get on or off this Canada ping list.


3 posted on 02/11/2006 4:46:10 PM PST by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Writer seems a lot ambivalent.


4 posted on 02/11/2006 4:48:51 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Since NATO especially Canada, France, Germany, and other weak - knees have signed up for this if they fail where the US succeeded they know that they will become irrelevant to the US in international security so the wise ones will succeed the truly weak will fail and be carried by the others. They all know that the mission cannot be allowed to fail.
5 posted on 02/11/2006 4:50:46 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

A bit over the top, IMHO. These troops don't have to take Afghanistan. No army has done that in a thousand years. The brutal Afghan winter...oh, wait a minute. We did it in six weeks. Never mind.


6 posted on 02/11/2006 4:58:00 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Six weeks. Just about as long as the French lasted against Von Moltke in the Franco-Prussian War.


7 posted on 02/11/2006 5:01:02 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN - 3rd Bn. Fifth Marines RVN 1969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
We did it in six weeks

No, we didn't. We ran the Taliban out of Kabul. They are still out there up in the hills and across the Pak border. Wherever the Pashtuns live, you will find Taliban.

8 posted on 02/11/2006 5:07:50 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Sometimes you just have to kill all of the inhabitants and salt the fields.


9 posted on 02/11/2006 5:13:42 PM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; DevSix; Decepticon; dirtboy; wildcatf4f3; Criminal Number 18F; Squantos; ...
Where the Taliban still rule - Waziristan
10 posted on 02/11/2006 5:15:57 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Would you use ovens in your "Final Solution to the Pashtun Problem?"

There are 16 million of them and you would have to get them all.

11 posted on 02/11/2006 5:28:25 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Oh, gosh, I'm sorry. You're right. If they are going to kill us and then kill us again for fighting back, there is nothing we can do. Its a lost cause. Gosh if they have honest to goodness tenacity then what are we to do. We can't possibly win against that can we? Blood thirsty savages should never be met with force, less we offend them.

If NATO forces are fired on, they should return fire with extreme prejudice. I don't think ovens will be necessary, but if they all wish to die, then perhaps the buzzards will be overloaded.

12 posted on 02/11/2006 5:43:17 PM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Who would you send out into the Hindu Kush to rub the Pashtuns out? Would you come out with your snivel gear and a deer rifle and help us, or would you just carry on with your little life, periodically getting on the internet to advocate genocide?

If you have nothing better to offer to the discussion, perhaps you should back away from the keyboard.

13 posted on 02/11/2006 6:03:10 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Greetings No.4

Are you back from the "end of the world"

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


14 posted on 02/11/2006 6:09:05 PM PST by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alfa6

Yep


15 posted on 02/11/2006 6:13:36 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Cannoneer No. 4; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; ...

-


19 posted on 02/11/2006 6:51:31 PM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clive; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...

Canada Ping!

Please FReepmail me to get on or off this Canada ping list.


20 posted on 02/11/2006 7:05:08 PM PST by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson