Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seize marijuana market from criminal class
The Free Lance-Star (Fredericksburg, VA) ^ | 2/9/2003 | Kevin B. Zeese

Posted on 02/11/2003 6:49:57 AM PST by MrLeRoy

WASHINGTON--A friend recently remarked to me, "Alcohol is the original date-rape drug." That's very sadly true. And it's why I found it hypocritical that the national drug czar's new ad equating marijuana use with teen pregnancy should debut during the Super Bowl, in which beer and sex were the dominant advertising themes.

Teen drinking is the bigger problem, both in sheer numbers as well as health risks, yet the federal agency overseeing drug-control policy ignores it. An antiteen drinking commercial would have been a powerful counterpoint during that game; the antipot ad came off as a clumsy attempt to maintain beer's market share.

These ads are emblematic of the government's overall war on marijuana. Since marijuana was first federally outlawed in 1937, prohibition has had the perverse effect of making marijuana more popular, particularly among youth and the counterculture. Our government insists on staying the course even though there is no evidence that criminalizing marijuana has ever reduced its use, let alone its trafficking. Meanwhile, the focus on marijuana diverts attention away from more serious problems.

Historian Barbara Tuchman once defined folly in government as the perverse persistence in bad policy in spite of evidence of its failure and the existence of a reasonable alternative.

Marijuana prohibition is a clear example of this. Reports by governmental commissions in several countries point out its failure and call for drastic changes, from decriminalization (for example, the Shafer Commission in 1972) to legalization (a Canadian Senate committee report in 2002). So many of our political leaders have tried marijuana that it becomes news if a politician ever denies any "youthful indiscretions." And yet, still prohibition persists. Why?

Some argue that marijuana is a dangerous drug so it must be banned. Yet we've decided that the dangers of alcohol and tobacco present an acceptable risk, so let's compare:

Alcohol overdoses kill more than 15,000 people each year in the United States, and alcohol-related deaths push the toll up to more than 100,000 annually; marijuana, according to the scientific evidence, has not racked up a single overdose death in centuries of use.

Alcohol use is involved in 40 percent of the violent crimes committed in the United States annually; marijuana is associated with meditative, peaceful behavior, while violence in the marijuana trade is the result of prohibition, not the drug.

Tobacco use is credited with more than 400,000 deaths annually, according to the Surgeon General; in spite of decades of trying, the federal government has still not found anyone dying from marijuana use.

Clearly, marijuana prohibition is not justified by health concerns.

Prohibitionists say we don't need to legalize yet another drug because the ones we have do too much damage. That argument misses the point in many ways.

First, marijuana is widely used, legal or not. At least 21 million people used it last year, according to the federal Household Survey. (The real number is much higher, possibly 40 million; government surveys of illegal behavior are not noted for their accuracy and are widely believed to underreport the true totals.)

More important, marijuana is not simply another substance, it's a less dangerous--not safe, but less dangerous--alternative to drugs we already make available. And, if regulated as we do with alcohol, there would be guarantees of marijuana purity as well as regulation of potency, something the illegal market does not provide.

Prohibitionists counter: Ending marijuana prohibition "sends the wrong message" that legalizing drugs supposedly connotes societal approval of drug abuse. Oh, really? Then we need to bring back alcohol prohibition because, by that logic, legal alcohol sends the message that alcoholism and alcohol abuse are OK. Obviously, that's not true. And we're not going back to alcohol prohibition. We need to turn in a different direction.

It makes no sense to continue threatening people with arrest over their simple use of marijuana. A regulated system takes control of the marijuana market away from the criminals. This means age limits, just as we have for alcohol--drug dealers never ask for ID.

As for the "gateway" theory? Research shows that alcohol and tobacco are more likely suspects than marijuana. A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that early alcohol and tobacco use were strong indicators of later drug use. That study's authors contended that the link between marijuana and other illegal drugs may be due solely to marijuana's illegality, nothing more.

A regulated marijuana market--similar to alcohol but a little more restricted (no Super Bowl marijuana promotions, for example)--is workable. And selling U.S.-grown marijuana through state-run outlets similar to Virginia's ABC stores could bring in millions in tax revenue to states and the federal government.

So why does prohibition persist? As Tuchman put it in her book "The March of Folly": "Wooden-headedness, the source of self-deception, is a factor that plays a remarkably large role in government. It consists in assessing a situation in terms of preconceived fixed notions while ignoring or rejecting any contrary signs. It is acting according to wish while not allowing oneself to be deflected by the facts."

Seventy years ago, we ended the tragic mistake that was alcohol prohibition. The time has now come to end the folly of marijuana prohibition.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: banglist; libertarians; losersareusers; usersarelosers; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-295 next last
To: CWOJackson
She doesn't like me tapping on the glass and stirring the little things up.

Simple things for ...

and I'm sure if the aquarium is not available, there are plenty of one winged flies to keep you busy ....

She believes you should allow lower life forms some peace and comfort in their solitude.

So you spend a lot of time alone ... huh?

141 posted on 02/11/2003 9:46:01 AM PST by clamper1797 (Thorazine has been found helpful in cases such as these ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
The groundswell is against you, and you seem to be having a problem handling the change. Sorry.

142 posted on 02/11/2003 9:47:47 AM PST by William Terrell (Advertise in this space - Low rates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Naw, I have respect for injured insects.
143 posted on 02/11/2003 9:47:54 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
Ground swell?

Like that amazing victory in Nevada. Your ground swell is worthy or racing a glacier.

144 posted on 02/11/2003 9:49:25 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
What's that got to do with whether decent people read these threads?

If it makes you feel any better you should read the Civil War threads - the people who flame on the drug threads are pikers compared to them (not that I would ever flame anyone on a drug thread).

145 posted on 02/11/2003 9:49:31 AM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I read that the Marijuana Policy Project spent about $2 million promoting legalized pot in Nevada. That's a lot of lids.
146 posted on 02/11/2003 9:50:11 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
All that money up in smoke?
147 posted on 02/11/2003 9:51:28 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Gun grabbers believe this Amendment means that the right of the people to keep and bear arms may be infringed.

148 posted on 02/11/2003 9:52:17 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Naw, I have respect for injured insects

It's that feeling of regret and responsibility for their condition that triggers your respect for them ...

Do you gain even more respect for them if you pull off the other wing too ?

Do you hold more respect for the one that lives the longest ... do you have contests for them ?

149 posted on 02/11/2003 9:53:12 AM PST by clamper1797 (Thorazine has been found helpful in cases such as these ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Ken H; Roscoe
I read the thread Roscoe posted. Extremely scary.
150 posted on 02/11/2003 9:56:53 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
All that money up in smoke?

Maybe not all of it. I believe that the Marijuana Policy Project operates as a "non-profit". Tax deductible.

151 posted on 02/11/2003 9:58:33 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Amazing. Well, it's been entertaining but...

Take care.

152 posted on 02/11/2003 10:00:04 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Me too. C'ya.
153 posted on 02/11/2003 10:01:35 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Ground Swell?

Take a year, say 1985. Plot the number of anti-drug war, specifically cannabis, articles in print and broacast media including such shows as 60 Munites and 20/20. On each subsequent year plot the same. You have an increasing number of them in each succeeding year. Add in the internet, where the ordinary citizen can sound off. And the government forces are all allied against it, so there is only one source of this resistance: the people.

That constitutes groundswell, pookie. Deal with it.

154 posted on 02/11/2003 10:03:41 AM PST by William Terrell (Advertise in this space - Low rates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
My, the little vermin are particularly active today. Two threads gone so far.
155 posted on 02/11/2003 10:31:57 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson; Roscoe
I deeply appreciate the persistant wrong-headed posts you make.

Sometimes,(rarely, but sometimes) I feel like becoming more charitable towards those who support the Thugs. Your various posts dissuade me. ;^)

Someday there will be trials; if you're lucky, you might get one.
156 posted on 02/11/2003 10:33:01 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Yep, and I'm the King of Norway...
157 posted on 02/11/2003 10:34:04 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I love your sardines.
158 posted on 02/11/2003 10:35:58 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
But the smoked (no pun intended) kippers are better don't you think?
159 posted on 02/11/2003 10:37:00 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
What brand?
160 posted on 02/11/2003 10:39:22 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson