Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UK, Japan, South Africa and Australia are among dozens of countries suffering mystery spikes of all different kinds of tumors in young people
daily mail ^

Posted on 03/15/2024 8:25:21 AM PDT by algore

Doctors across the world are sounding the alarm over a surging epidemic of young people being diagnosed with cancers more commonly associated with the elderly.

Between 1990 and 2019, cases of cancer in young people across the globe have increased by 79 percent and deaths have risen 28 percent.

Studies project diagnoses will continue to rise by 31 percent and deaths will rise by 21 percent in 2030.

Nearly every continent is experiencing an increase of various types of cancer in people under 50 years old, which is particularly problematic as the disease tends to be caught in later stages in this population because most doctors aren't trained to look for it in young people.

The disparities of rates and types of the disease are puzzling scientists and have prompted some to kick off multi-decade research projects that will involve hundreds of thousands of people from around the world.

Globally, Australia has seen the highest number of early-onset cancer diagnoses in the world, with a rate of 135 per 100,000 people.

Nearby New Zealand has the second highest rate, at 119 cases in people under 50 per 100,000 people.

But while breast cancer is the top disease in Australia, colon cancer ranks first in its neighbor.

In Asia, Japan and South Korea may be close in proximity and similar economically, but they have different rates of early-onset colon cancer, which is increasing at a faster rate in South Korea.

The United States falls in sixth place, with 87 cases per 100,000 people under 50 years old and the UK takes the 28th spot, with 70.5 cases per 100,000 people.

Cancers increasing the fastest include throat and prostate cancers. Early-onset cancers with the highest mortality include beast, tracheal (windpipe), lung, stomach and colon.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: cancer; suddenly; unknown; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Experts are baffled, but I am pretty future historians will agree that it was a symptom of "Sudden Climate Change".
1 posted on 03/15/2024 8:25:21 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore

Insert your favorite narrative.


2 posted on 03/15/2024 8:27:49 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

It could be anything except the one thin that may never be mentioned., the experimental, useless tool of oppression - the clot shot.


3 posted on 03/15/2024 8:28:08 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Yeah, my money is on climate change too...


4 posted on 03/15/2024 8:31:11 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore
Mystery SPIKES. Spikes. Spikes. Spikes.

Hmm. It's a mystery. And the relation between anti-psychotic drugs and shooters? Another mystery? And suicides among the gender dysphoric, and especially among the post-surgical gender dysphoric? So many mysteries.....

But yeah, spikes.

5 posted on 03/15/2024 8:31:55 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore
Explained in another FR post made today. CoVID 'spikes' are single layer carbon hydroxide, and one of the sharpest substances found in nature on a nano-scale. The mRNA carries instructions to have your body make this substance in you. The mRNA can be transferred thru persons' eyes from 'vaccinated' persons.

link to FR post

6 posted on 03/15/2024 8:32:39 AM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Didn’t Australia and NZ have some of the most draconian vaccine rules.


7 posted on 03/15/2024 8:33:41 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

What are the respective COVID vaccination rates?


8 posted on 03/15/2024 8:43:34 AM PDT by null and void (There’s only one thing that’s for sure. Everyone on all sides a conflict will be happy to lie to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

This is talking about a 30 year pattern, not 3 years. My first guess would be (in part) increasingly processed foods/unhealthy diet, as a vague hypothesis. But I’m curious what others come up with.


9 posted on 03/15/2024 8:44:04 AM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mware
Didn’t Australia and NZ have some of the most draconian vaccine rules.

BINGO!

10 posted on 03/15/2024 8:44:42 AM PDT by null and void (There’s only one thing that’s for sure. Everyone on all sides a conflict will be happy to lie to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: algore

Nab the jab!


11 posted on 03/15/2024 8:44:49 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Thumbing money works great in movies but not so good in real life , the Chinese Communist Party can’t wait until the West is on digital bucks so they can screw everything up


12 posted on 03/15/2024 8:48:54 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Over that time scale this could well be a root cause. Differing cancer distributions could correlate to different cultural dietary preferences.

Might also have some correlation to increased exposure to ‘electronic smog’, more transmissions on more wavelengths.

Or who knows? A missing ingredient, from say, depleted minerals in farm fields, reduced air pollution, lack of fiber in the diet, or???


13 posted on 03/15/2024 8:53:41 AM PDT by null and void (There’s only one thing that’s for sure. Everyone on all sides a conflict will be happy to lie to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970
This is talking about a 30 year pattern, not 3 years

WTF are you talking about? The FR post was from a scientist who announced his findings about carbon hydroxide found in CoVID products who 'died suddenly'.

14 posted on 03/15/2024 8:55:01 AM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: algore

I avoided the vaxx like the plague it was, most didn’t. My daughter fell for the scam. She had the vaxx while pregnant! I was apoplectic at the time but could not dissuade her. My grandson was born 2/16/22 with “unexplained” lung issues. He was in intensive care for three weeks and was very undersized the first 18 months of his life. He is a fine, perfectly healthy two year old today but I live in mortal fear that he has not seen the last effect of having that poison mainlined to him in the womb.
This whole tragedy loses it’s comedic aspect when it strikes home. No, I’m not trying to criticize you or anything like that. I just hope no members of your family become victims as this global catastrophe continues to play out.


15 posted on 03/15/2024 8:55:29 AM PDT by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

What are the numbers between 1990 and 2018?


16 posted on 03/15/2024 9:01:29 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

The OP is talking about a rise in rates from 1990-2019. That doesn’t even cover the period in which COVID-19 would have an impact, so you are off topic on this thread.


17 posted on 03/15/2024 9:07:42 AM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck
Problem is the dates stated were from 1990-2019, before the mRNA shot was introduced. That was my initial thought as well, however, the date range negates that, unless of course they are lying with regards to the dates, which is certainly a real possibility.

I do not remember ever hearing about this increase in cancers in the under 50 age group until this report. If it had been tracked for 29 years, why are we only hearing about it now, 4-5 years after the end date of date range?

But cancer under the age of 50 is also not unheard of, so could it be that as population increases, the occurrence of cancers increases in line with population increase and is the explanation for the increase.

18 posted on 03/15/2024 9:09:19 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. They are doing everything they can to obfuscate the disaster with long timelines and fudged numbers. The federal government has lost the Mandate of Heaven and is heading for a reckoning sooner or later.


19 posted on 03/15/2024 9:14:49 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: algore

Don’t you dare say it’s caused by you-know-what.


20 posted on 03/15/2024 9:18:24 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson