Well, let’s see...
If I knew he was epileptic, and I told him that he deserves to have a seizure, and then I sent him a link to Killer Japanese Seizure Robots, and he viewed the link and then suffered a seizure as a result, yes, I could be guilty.
It seems like a stupid and dangerous thing to do.
So he can be stupid enough to click on a link with “seizurerobots” in the URL, and you think I would be at fault?
Just no.
Nonsense ... nobody forced the Lib to look at it , much less stare at it, which would have been required for it to cause a seizure ... you have no idea what you’re talking about
“Well, let’s see...
If I knew he was epileptic, and I told him that he deserves to have a seizure, and then I sent him a link to Killer Japanese Seizure Robots, and he viewed the link and then suffered a seizure as a result, yes, I could be guilty.
It seems like a stupid and dangerous thing to do.”
It seems like you are as stupid as the SOB making the original claim
What if you knew he was, and sent him the link and weren’t stupid enough to refer to it, but just put “hey dude, this is pretty trippy! Check it out!”
Muuuaaahahahaha...;-)