Skip to comments.
Park Slope Rally to Call for Total Obstruction of Trump Agenda
Patch ^
| January 5, 2017
| John V. Santore
Posted on 01/05/2017 1:11:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Comments?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Play ball with dangerous, amoral people and we will devote ourselves to your political demise... He's talking about the Clintons, right?
2
posted on
01/05/2017 1:13:33 PM PST
by
econjack
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What part of “in the minority” doesn’t compute?
How about who gives a rat’s.
3
posted on
01/05/2017 1:13:58 PM PST
by
OpusatFR
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Rallies , Protests etc keeps them busy and happy let be at it ,LOL
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So, we have what 6 or 7 million people in New York. 300 people show up, and it will be a major news story?
5
posted on
01/05/2017 1:15:14 PM PST
by
nikos1121
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cockfights in Brooklyn draw bigger crowds.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m fine with them protesting in front of Chuckie’s place. As much as they want.
To: nikos1121
8
posted on
01/05/2017 1:20:17 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: econjack
“He’s talking about the Clintons, right? “
I thought the guy was referring to democrats in general
9
posted on
01/05/2017 1:20:43 PM PST
by
Fai Mao
(PIAPS for Prison)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What? No calls for bipartisanship?
10
posted on
01/05/2017 1:22:11 PM PST
by
joshua c
(Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
To: nikos1121
They will get 300 people, counting every reporter in a 100 mile radius who shows up to cover the story.
11
posted on
01/05/2017 1:23:05 PM PST
by
matt04
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yeah. Sounds like a great ####ing day to take the half hour drive to Park Slope with a ####ing Trump cap on.
12
posted on
01/05/2017 1:25:51 PM PST
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: econjack
This one is even funnier:
“The event’s organizers, Tim Murphy and Adam Baran, also wrote that they expect Schumer to “obstruct the Trump agenda with the same ruthless thoroughness that Republicans in Congress have obstructed Obama’s agenda the past eight years.”
I wouldn’t associate the word ruthless with the Republican Party when it comes to fighting the Rats.
13
posted on
01/05/2017 1:27:04 PM PST
by
princeofdarkness
(Leftists. Their only response to failure is to double down.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
IIRC I read just recently that in ‘18 the Rats have about twice as many Senate seats to defend than do Republicans and that a substantial percentage of those seats are in states that went Trump last November.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let the heathen rage. That’s what they always do.
To: princeofdarkness
Indeed. The GOP has had quite a bit of power since 2010 and they did absolutely NOTHING with it. I think that’s one reason Trump won: People know he’s not an established GOP member and that what they want. And if Mitch McConnell does what he’s talking about, he’ll be out on his a$$ next time, too.
16
posted on
01/05/2017 1:41:44 PM PST
by
econjack
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just checked on the Senate website...in '18 there are 33 Senate seats up for election.Rats (or "Independents" who vote with Rats) currently hold 25 of them and 8 are currently held by Republicans.Of the 25 held by Rats 10 of them are in states carried by DJT.Of the 8 held by Republicans only 1 is in a state carried by The Former Twelfth Lady.
Simple math shows that the Senate has a real chance of tipping more toward the GOP than is currently the case.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I suggest they use their PPACA mental health benefits before January 1, 2018.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We need a counterprotest!
19
posted on
01/05/2017 1:44:49 PM PST
by
oblomov
(We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just did some research....unless I’m mistaken “Park Slope” is a place where you’ll find “The 1%” living.Very chic...very prosperous...quite expensive.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson