Skip to comments.
Mom, daughter charged with incest after marrying in Oklahoma
Associated Press ^
| Sep 7, 2016 6:48 PM EDT
Posted on 09/07/2016 6:00:38 PM PDT by Olog-hai
A woman and her daughter are facing incest charges after authorities learned the pair were legally married in Oklahoma this year, and that the mother had married her son a few years earlier.
The motivation behind the March marriage was unclear Wednesday, when 43-year-old Patricia Ann Spann and her daughter, 25-year-old Misty Velvet Dawn Spann, made initial appearances in Stephens County district court.
Under Oklahoma law, marrying a close relative is considered incest whether or not a sexual relationship exists. …
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; incest; inheriancetaxes; oklahoma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
09/07/2016 6:00:38 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Trying to get away from the inheritance tax?
2
posted on
09/07/2016 6:02:10 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: Olog-hai
Love doesn’t win this time? Not even for 2 women of the same sex?
What do the black robed monks in DC have to say about this?
3
posted on
09/07/2016 6:02:48 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)
To: Olog-hai
I would bet they’re testing the US Governments definition of marriage. This is a good thing because it proves that homosexual marriage open the floodgate for any type of marriage. IF marriage is NOT between ONE man and ONE woman then anything is possible.
4
posted on
09/07/2016 6:02:59 PM PDT
by
DouglasKC
To: DouglasKC
I say leave them alone. Attention whores
5
posted on
09/07/2016 6:04:35 PM PDT
by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: ConservativeMind
[ Trying to get away from the inheritance tax? ]
Dem logic: The Dead Vote, Tax the Dead!
6
posted on
09/07/2016 6:05:20 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
To: ConservativeMind
Why do we privilege sexual and romantic relationships over other bonds? Why shouldn’t any two people be able to become domestic partners with full legal benefits?
7
posted on
09/07/2016 6:05:53 PM PDT
by
heartwood
(If you're looking for a </sarc tag>, you just saw it.)
To: Olog-hai
We live in such an incestophobic country. </sarcasm>
8
posted on
09/07/2016 6:05:53 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: DouglasKC
Yep, can’t prosecute this imo.
9
posted on
09/07/2016 6:06:01 PM PDT
by
FreedomStar3028
(Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
To: Olog-hai
10
posted on
09/07/2016 6:06:53 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
(Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
To: heartwood
Why do we privilege sexual and romantic relationships over other bonds? Because "other bonds" are not capable of procreating children who are dependent upon the "sexual and romantic" bonds of their parents for survival?
11
posted on
09/07/2016 6:07:44 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: Olog-hai
It gets worse. In 2008 she married her own son. An excerpt from the article:
"Detectives later learned she married her son in 2008. He filed for an annulment 15 months later citing "incest," stating he was married to his birth mother, according to the affidavit."
WEIRDOS
To: DIRTYSECRET
Agree. It’s not like they’re apt to reproduce.
13
posted on
09/07/2016 6:08:00 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
To: Olog-hai
Perhaps Caitlin Jenner should marry her/his self.
14
posted on
09/07/2016 6:09:05 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Olog-hai
Well, the so-called LGBT lobby and their brain-dead supporters have assured us that ‘all love is equal,’ so why the heck not a mother and daughter? Not sure how the Oklahoma law could logically withstand scrutiny under the Obergefell’s any-consenting-twosome standard.
To: Huskrrrr
People actually do that. It’s even got its own term, now: “Sologamy”.
16
posted on
09/07/2016 6:09:35 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
17
posted on
09/07/2016 6:09:44 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
(Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
To: Dallas59
Miss Misty Velvet Dawn looks more like a Mr..
I think there’s something a little kinky going on there.
18
posted on
09/07/2016 6:11:33 PM PDT
by
fivecatsandadog
(GO TRUMP! (isn't Obama gone yet?))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s kind of reactionary, don’t you think?
19
posted on
09/07/2016 6:11:43 PM PDT
by
heartwood
(If you're looking for a </sarc tag>, you just saw it.)
To: heartwood
Spoken like a true special snowflake.
20
posted on
09/07/2016 6:13:35 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
