Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why It's Time to Repeal the Second Amendment (Masks are dropping)
Rolling Stone ^ | June 13, 2016 | David S. Cohen

Posted on 06/14/2016 9:40:20 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

This article is just more liberal bs to disarm us and make Clintoon, the president, who killed the second amendment!

Sessions: Clinton is the most anti-Second Amendment candidate ever!

May 22, 2016, 10:01 am

By Rebecca Savransky

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) on Sunday slammed Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton as “the most anti-Second Amendment” presidential candidate the country has ever seen.

Sessions, who endorsed presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, criticized Clinton for saying the District of Columbia v. Heller decision, which he said “protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms,” was wrong.

With the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Sessions said the court is now split, 4-4, in its support of the decision.

“She gets in, she will appoint somebody who changes it, and what that means is it’s no longer a personal right to have a gun, but every city, county and state can completely ban firearms in America,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.”

“This would be the greatest reduction of Second Amendment rights since the founding of the Republic.”

Sessions said it was important the American people understand the extent of Clinton’s “radical position” on the issue.

Sessions also called the list of potential Supreme Court nominees Trump released last week a “really fine list” of “accomplished” people.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280839-sessions-clinton-is-the-most-anti-second-amendment-candidate


21 posted on 06/14/2016 9:51:02 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (La Raza thugs in America are Mexico's form of Isis terrorism/terrorists/invaders!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Eh, they’re consistent at least. They’ve done a de facto repeal of the 1st, choosing which speech is acceptable, seems like a good time to go after the 2nd as well.

I still think the next constitutional amendment should be:

All laws shall apply equally to citizens and government and their employees. Any exemption given to government in any fashion is hereby granted to all citizens. All prohibitions which are applied to citizens are to be immediately applied to all forms of government and employees.


22 posted on 06/14/2016 9:51:10 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I revere the document when it is used to further social justice...

But only then?

-PJ

23 posted on 06/14/2016 9:51:36 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

>>The liberty of some to own guns cannot take precedence over the liberty of everyone to live their lives free from the risk of being easily murdered. It has for too long, and we must now say no more.

How many has communism killed? How many millions slaughtered by their own government just in the 20th century? By this moron’s logic, we should ban leftists and government. After all, don’t we have the right not to be easily murdered by Khmer Rouge worshiping leftists like this author?


24 posted on 06/14/2016 9:51:58 AM PDT by vikingd00d (nulla seruitus turpior est quam uoluntaria -- Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They also blatantly wrote racism into the Constitution by counting slaves as only 3/5 of a person for purposes of Congressional representation.

I stopped reading right there. How can he claim any authority on the constitution when he doesn't even realize that the point of making slaves count for 3/5 was specifically to limit the congressional power of slave holding states by making sure they didn't get an inflated house representation? The slave holding states, in case it actually needs to be said, were all pro slavery. So reducing their representation is in effect, an anti slavery move.

25 posted on 06/14/2016 9:52:13 AM PDT by Drrdot (Ban murder, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So, some left wing ahole writing for the dopper rag “Rolling Stone” wants to repeal our Second Amendment rights?

Screw him.

Yes, the people in the present day have more powerful weapons than they did 200 years ago, but the present day government is far more fascist in 2016, and they have even MORE powerful weapons to oppress and kill we, the people!

Again, screw you, Cohen.


26 posted on 06/14/2016 9:52:20 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Ban muslims, NOT guns.....Register liberals, NOT guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nothing in the Constitution about homosexual marriage, abortion, or Sodomy but all of that is settled law and that’s that according to the Left.


27 posted on 06/14/2016 9:52:23 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (MAGA! Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Second Amendment needs to be repealed because it is outdated, a threat to liberty and a suicide pact. When the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, there were no weapons remotely like the AR-15 assault rifle and many of the advances of modern weaponry were long from being invented or popularized.

Riiiiight. The framers were as stoopid as David S. Cohen.

You know what else the framers didn't foresee? They couldn't predict telephones, radio, television, or the internet. Yet, I'll bet little David thinks all those unpredictable methods are entirely within the bounds of the First amendment's provisions for the "press" - which to the framers was a big iron, slow moving machine cranking out scores of copies per day. Movable type, physical pressure - that is precisely what the framers thought of when describing the press.

Unlike little David, the framers weren't stupid enough to believe themselves all-knowing and brilliant.

28 posted on 06/14/2016 9:52:51 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

For someone who claims to teach the Constitution for a living he appears to have no understanding of it or the history and thinking behind what is in it. His thinking on the subject seems limited to leftist memes.


29 posted on 06/14/2016 9:53:11 AM PDT by Flying Circus (God save us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

....And no one listens to them!


30 posted on 06/14/2016 9:54:02 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: randita
Many other countries do not have the right to bear arms in their constitutions, yet they are subject to terrorist attacks.

Talk about an inconvenient truth! Gun control in paris. Very tight. It did nada to stop terrorists.

The Boston bombers bomb was constructed with a pressure cooker. This writer might want to outlaw those also.

The Madrid bombers? I think they were already using banned explosives.

31 posted on 06/14/2016 9:54:26 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randita

Many other countries do not have the right to bear arms in their constitutions, yet they are subject to terrorist attacks.


Shhh!! Rolling Bones doesn’t want you to think independently or logically!! You are disrupting the force of their propaganda.


32 posted on 06/14/2016 9:55:32 AM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I notice the author's last name is Cohen.

I bet there are more than a few relatives in his ancestry who wished there had been a Second Amendment available to them.

33 posted on 06/14/2016 9:56:18 AM PDT by wintertime (Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He writes crazy but that is what is being taught indirectly and directly for some in the public schools and the universities. That will show up in ever increasing %ages of young people who are horrified that guns are permitted in a “civilized” country. They will be a majority by and by.


34 posted on 06/14/2016 9:56:57 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And this socialist filth teaches our young what to believe and how to reason: “I revere the document when it is used to further social justice ...” And whom is it that determines what is ‘social justice’? Yup, the socialist fools like this miscreant. Not the Constitution, which contains the Bill of Rights, bilge spittlists like this professor want to cancel.


35 posted on 06/14/2016 9:57:08 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I teach the Constitution for a living. I revere the document when it is used to further social justice and make our country a more inclusive one. I admire the Founders for establishing a representative democracy that has survived for over two centuries.

That is as far as I was willing to go.


36 posted on 06/14/2016 9:57:44 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Be best if we could just herd up these anti-gun lemmings and send them to ISIS for target practice.


37 posted on 06/14/2016 9:58:00 AM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“For starters the Founders established a republic and not a democracy. Not sure how someone who “teaches the Constitution” could get that one wrong.”

The leftists’ god from Kenya (until he needed to run for president) is a self-proclaimed “Constitutional Law Professor” and gets EVERYTHING wrong.


38 posted on 06/14/2016 9:58:26 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CapnJack

Yeah, Perfesser, get an act of Congress passed with a 2/3rds majority & then get 38 states to ratify it.

Come on, hit the bricks & get ‘er done! Put some teeth in your belief.


39 posted on 06/14/2016 9:58:28 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Republic as you surely define it was repealed with the ratification of the 17th Amendment, We became a Democracy at that point. It has taken a long time for that to play out but we did pass quickly through that phase to the current system which is a limited but rapidly expanding Dictatorship.


40 posted on 06/14/2016 9:59:28 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson