If he does that billboard stunt, it'll be a Trump landslide.
Hint:
I mean, how are Sanders and Hillary going to compete?
Posted on 01/28/2016 12:59:57 PM PST by ken5050
If he does that billboard stunt, it'll be a Trump landslide.
Hint:
I mean, how are Sanders and Hillary going to compete?
Few men do.
Women marry up.
Whoops, that must be the sound of The Donald tearing up your phone number.
Just kidding...I know you are married with a lot o tax-chickadees... ;-)
Snarly Fiorina, on a thread about women and public nudity.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little. (OK, a *lot*.)
...as for ole' Snarly -- when she was CEO, she was the one who said, "No American has a right to a job."
Hi again, Tax-chick.
My later post wasn't plagiarism: I posted mine before I read this post of yours.
Great minds think alike: so consider this a hat tip.
Given that they likely involved someone else's head, if the rumors be true,...
you're probably right.
Which would give Donald (or anyone else) reason to think she might be available.
Accepted! For the record, I don't think being a nude model means Mrs. Trump (or any other) is a bad person. She's just a person whose standards of appropriateness are different from mine. The same with Ms. Kelly: I don't wear what she considers appropriate, either - not even as a nightgown.
The more things change, the more they stay the same. Mrs. Andrew Jackson was attacked as an adulteress and Mrs. James K. Polk as a high-fashion bimbo. To quote Mark Steyn, who has been playing around with his idiom lately, "Politics ain't beanbag."
One divorce is acceptable but two makes you unfit?
How about they are only married once but have a mistress?
A string of mistresses?
How about never being married at all?
Is fornication before marriage acceptable as long as they get married after?
How about if they don't but don't have a child?
How about if they don't and do have a child?
You can find presidents who have done all of this and more.
Reminds me of the righteous Christian Brits who hated Winston Churchill because he smoked cigars, drank whiskey, and used occasional profanity. We need an Alpha male more than ever.
Are morals important?
Is commitment to the family important?
Do you think being divorced twice and married three times is a good thing?
” One divorce is acceptable but two makes you unfit?”
One is bad, two is a trend.
“How about they are only married once but have a mistress?”
bad
“A string of mistresses?”
Deplorable
“How about never being married at all?”
Depends, but generally shows they are poorly adjusted individuals.
“Is fornication before marriage acceptable as long as they get married after?”
Its a sin right?
“How about if they don’t but don’t have a child?”
huh
Multiple divorces is an important tell for any individual. It shows poor judgement or significant personality issues at the least.
Are morals important?Is commitment to the family important?
Do you think being divorced twice and married three times is a good thing?
So much wrong here, where to begin. Considering Marriage and Divorce, there are only five mutually exclusive evidential data points possible for a given person ...
Objective reasoning should prevent any intelligent person from jumping to conclusions at this level of data collection as each of those categories can contain anyone from the most "moral" person to the most immoral.
I started to bullet list examples under each of those 5 categories but it quickly ran long, really long. There are practically infinite possibilities for each ranging from perfectly moral folks in bad marriages, cutting loose gold-diggers or cheating spouses, someone murdering their spouses, to immoral degenerate homos staying unmarried or faking it with illusory marriage. That's the tip of the iceberg.
So I'll sum up with simple question ... Which of those 5 scenarios is the moral one? And why can you not quickly disprove this moral judgment through a simple counter example?
To make moral judgments with this bare level of evidence requires one of two things, Amazing Kreskin level of clairvoyance or complete lack of objectivity.
God condemns divorce except in limited cases but I guess you know better.
Yes 2 divorces is all the evidence needed.
God condemns divorce except in limited cases but I guess you know better.Yes 2 divorces is all the evidence needed.
Know better than God? Hardly. I am an imperfect human being stuck on Earth just like you. But I asked which of those five scenarios represents a moral person? I don't see a clear answer there in your reply. But you have now inspired other questions ...
Let him who is without sin ...
May I suggest for you an awesome FReeper handle ... StoneCaster?
You utter nothing but nonsense. No difference from liberals who refuse to call evil evil and instead say the person made poor decisions.
Judging the moral fitness of our government representatives is part of what we are instructed to do.
You utter nothing but nonsense. No difference from liberals who refuse to call evil evil and instead say the person made poor decisions.Judging the moral fitness of our government representatives is part of what we are instructed to do.
You didn't judge when you had the chance up in post #195. Let's try again.
The five different possibilities for any potential candidate are ...
Okay, now judge. Who's kosher for us to vote for?
More nonsense
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.