Posted on 05/14/2014 10:36:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
You realize vetoes can be overwritten, don’t you?
Most divorces involve one partner compulsively using pornography making up crap about the other partner.
There, fixed it.
"Your honor, he is a bad man. A very, very bad man! Take him away!"
Bhatt v Bhatt.
It’s not difficult to get a divorce, and divorced men don’t go to prison because of a divorce. No need to panic.
See, that’s what I’m talking about. If you read the comments, you will know know that the well mannered college children discussed, was in the title thread. It’s not something I started.
If you don’t have anything better to do than just argue, address your comments to the originator of the thread. Your attempts at manipulating the conversation are just pathetic.
Yeah yeah just being facetious with the Babu Bhatt meme.
But the author does pull statistics out of, well, out of the air. Most divorces involve far more allegations of bad stuff than actual commissions of bad stuff. Divorce pleadings are probative of nothing.
“BTW, the more I read the Bible, the more amazed I am at just how good it really is. It is, at the barest minimum, an excellent guide to a healthy and happy life. It’s much more than that of course, but it’s also good advice for how to live well in this world.”
Many years ago I was going through a particularly tough time and turned to The Bible for guidance. It helped a lot, and I shared that with my sister, and I’ll never forget her describing The Bible as the “Master, Master Mechanic’s Manual.”
:) Here in the great state of Massachusetts, a divorce requires little. It’s my impression that it is when the custody of children is involved that things really get ugly.
The original post was at #28, and it’s been pulled. I read it before it was pulled, and what’s being claimed the poster said is a is not what was in that post.
Oh absolutely.
And if one went by child custody pleadings, one might (erroneously) aver that “most child custody cases involve one parent seriously abusing the children.” That logical lapse is apparent in the author’s suggestion that “most divorces involve one partner compulsively using pornography” without one iota of objective supporting data.
But yes, you are correct.
one survey of 16- to 20-year-olds found nearly one out of four young men and one out of 10 young women admitting they tried to kick the habit but could not.
Does "breaking the habit" mean not spending hours upon hours on porn sites, or does it mean never, ever looking at a naked chick again? The author doesn't elaborate (and I understand that the author doesn't have endless column space) but without more, there just isn't much upon which to assess the extent of the problem, if any.
Thanks, I searched it since you said that and found this, “World-proof your kids, don’t childproof their world: Lenore Skenazy” from 2012, and I seem to remember reading this, maybe FR, or maybe the mind is leaving the station. LOL
Whew. Thank you. :)
That wasn't my comment. My comment was that my 4-year old briefly stumbled across a porn site and since you clearly seem to be a subject matter expert on the damage porn causes children, I asked you if my son should seek counseling or if I should write him off as irreparably damaged?
Why this comment was removed, I have no idea.
*******************************
I could not agree more. At one time, it is my understanding that many of our forefathers used the Bible as their elementary method of education and literature.
My last post was awkwardly worded, but I hope that you understood my point.
Appropriately credited now. Thanks FRiend.
Your scornful words about the dangers of porn when children see it is duly noted.
Obviously it means viewing and using for sexual gratification, because that’s what people do with porn, on a regular basis, and even when wanting to stop, having a hard time not doing it.
It is unclear whether “looking at a naked chick” means having a personal relationship with a real woman, or using porn but not habitually.
The pulled post was sarcastic and scornful and making light of the dangers of children seeing porn. The poster claimed that his 4 yr old happening to see a porn site would cause the child no harm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.