IS EXACTLY WHAT I WROTE.
The dark child is claimed to be Mark in the family group image.
It is I who claims the family group image dates from 1966. No one said that Mark was born in 1966. I'm showing that Mark was about a year old in that family group image.
As we are debating, be my guest and show me where I am wrong, but you mustn't use 'Dreams' as proof of the existence of 'David' because that's the ORIGIN of the David myth.
The only time I am aware that Mark referred to his age was when he told an interviewer he was seven or eight when his parents separated. They separated in 1973. That brings you back to 1965, just as is shown in the ages stated for Mark as I posted in further comments on the matter.
Which makes him about a year old in that family group in which he's shown where Ruth is holding him.
You can name him what you like, but that five year old boy in that group isn't Mark, as you are expected to believe. Mark is the child Ruth is holding. The dark boy was born in 1961. Mark was born in 1965...over and over again...and that's because the two little boys are zero and one other, born in the same year.
Zero and the dark boy were both born in 1961. One went to Kenya and the other showed up in Hawaii. Now which one is supposed to be 'David'?