Alvin Onaka would not verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. He has to verify it if he can, by law.
What expert of yours is able to prove Onaka a liar?
And we know that the security paper that the White House image is on is not the security paper that Hawaii uses. Somebody screwed up when they created that background layer.
But suppose you are right. A reporter at the press gaggle asked if the press would be able to examine the actual BC and was laughed at. Even Obama was not allowed to hold the actual BC. Why is that? Why don’t we have video footage of somebody examining that actual document in person, so we can see three dimensions?
My arguments have never relied on computer analysis, because I’m not knowledgeable about computers, so if the “expert” you claim (and who is this expert?) is going to say that I am “all full of it”, he/she had better address the non-computer proofs against the authenticity of that document. It’s quite a conspiracy theory if he/she is going to claim that Onaka perjured himself in a legal response to the AZ SOS. What evidence does he/she have, to refute the presumption of regularity for Onaka’s response - his response of NOT verifying the genuineness of the White House image or the facts of birth requested on the verification application?
The Hawaii Department of Health has repeatedly said the birth certificate is genuine, and Obama was born in Hawaii. They've said it just about every way they possibly could except for standing on their heads and singing the announcement if four-part harmony.
Just because you imagine they are parsing their words in such a way as to not say it while saying it, doesn't mean that's so.
As far as reporters go, reporters saw the paper birth certificate, and one of them even took a picture of it, which is obviously a photo of a real paper document.
Ah, but that's not good enough for you. You have to have a VIDEO.
This is how birthers work. No matter what you produce, it's never enough.
And never will be.
We could travel back in time, and bring back James Madison, George Washington, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton to swear on live TV before the US Supreme Court that they never even thought of Vattel when they wrote "natural born citizen," and still birthers would insist it takes birth on US soil plus two citizen parents.
And we could produce a video of Stanley Ann giving birth to Obama in Hawaii with a newspaper on the nightstand that said "Honolulu, August whatever of 1961," and birthers would still insist he must have been born somewhere else.
You know it's true.