Birthmarks and moles are two entirely different things, and if you want ears enlarged, you do it. I’m not your servant. I told you, take it or leave it. You referred to the image of the boy on the beach, you wanted that for comparison, didn’t you see that image is one I posted in the composite yesterday? Your visual comprehension is obviously retarded.
There is certainly such a thing as a “birthmark mole”. About one in every hundred babies have one.
You are missing the point about the ears. When it came to arguing whether SADO is the nude woman in the pics that Gilbert analyzed, you knew just what to do. Nobody had to suggest it or prompt you. You posted compare and contrast pics of the woman’s nose, chin, teeth, etc. You used those pics to make your case that there were 2 different women involved. This is what you did.
This is also the reason you have NOT done similar compare and contrast pics of the various little boys’ ears. Such a comparison would prove just the opposite of the point you’re trying to make. The ears are differently shaped. If you were to crop the pics, englarge the ears and place them side by side, your entire theory would blow up/disintegrate.
This is why, when someone suggests you do that, you naturally resort to the same old personal attacks/insults. Those tactics worked very well for you for a long time, but they’ve finally grown stale and tiresome. The ears are different. That is the fact. Live w it.