Nobody said it was "synonymous." Fred erroneously tried to assert that the matching teeth had no value, and I pointed out that dental records are used to identify people, which is true.
PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEETH OF TWO DIFFERENT WOMEN ARE NOT DENTAL RECORDS.
The feeble straws you are clutching aren’t helping you any.
FN said that “dental records” are not the same as looking at a couple of old photos.
ANd I posted links detailing exactly what dental records are.
You’re feeble, you know that? And obvious?
The only question is your motive; why you are trying (in vain, I may add) to make FN’s research look false, and your own feeble and frail efforts look accurate. Actually, all you are doing is harming your own efforts (whatever the motive may be) and helping anyone who is reading this see which comments and evidence make sense, and which do not.