The mythos of the Mother is so powerful in human culture (mother earth!) the very idea that the woman with whom he was first photographed with at the age of three isn’t his mother, is like a slap across the face with a dirty wet sock to most people. It’s so offensive that every theory, even though there is no actual proof she’s his mother, comes back to it full circle. His father was obviously a coloured man, so his father has to be either the kenyan student as according to ‘Dreams’ or the other, nearest black, the man who was 35 years older, and to achieve that idea, the girl had to be turned into a pornographic model (although it’s been clearly shown the photographs were first published in 1958) but then, she was down at the docks chasing black men wasn’t she? Straight out of high school and into bed with her appetite for negro men...although she hadn’t had a boyfriend in high school. The people who write this stuff about a girl they didn’t know show all the instincts of a vouyer, imagining a seventeen year old in a physical, intimate relationship with a man so much older, a man with an attractive wife and four of five children, reeks of a pornographic imagination.
So, you’re angry with the girl because she gave birth to a creature whose politics are a threat, are you?
Get off her back, I’ve got happy news for you...she wasn’t his mother. She was his Nanny. It looks like she dropped out of high school and went to live with her uncle, (she was accepted to attend the U of Chicago, according to ‘Dreams’ remember?) And Uncle Charles was the Deputy Director of the Library. Uncle Charles was still at the U of Chicago when zero was a law lecturer there...and his wife was on a committee with the wife of David Axelrod. They all lived in Hyde Park.
Who-ever wrote ‘Dreams’ attempted to illustrate her passion for blacks by telling you she first saw the film Black Orpheus when she was ‘only sixteen then’ and was working as an au paire in Chicago. That film was released in December 1959 iirc. (Check it out, I’m writing from memory.)
So while she was in Chicago, her ‘nude’ photographs supposedly taken by Frank, whom she had never met, appeared in exotic magazines that were published in New York. And she then marries a black native from Kenya, does she? I guess that was to cover up the fact that she was pregnant to Frank and that’s why they sent her to Kenya where she ended up taking a train from Kisimu to Nairobi and then to Mombasa with the Obama Clan and had a baby in Mombasa and/or tried to get on an aircraft to get back to the US but wasn’t allowed to board.
Something like that.
Poor Stanley Ann Dunham. Poor Stanley Armour, whose friendship with Frank has also been an assumption, a working tool without proof. Poor Madelyn, whose ashes were thrown off the cliff in Hawaii into the wind, rather than have her buried next to her husband...but not ‘poor Frank’ because he had lots more to answer for than we will ever find out, he was the man you went to for what it was you needed by the way of documentation, in his capacity as the head of the organization known as THE PROTECTION OF THE FOREIGN BORN - Frank could get you anything you wanted I guess, like announcements in papers and ID documents, and fake marriage licences.
He managed to keep some very well known communists from being deported from Hawaii, in his time at the helm. But no one wants to know any of this, it’s all too complicated. I realized it was going to be a hard slog when it became apparent that no one could add 18 months to July 1959 and reach the date JANUARY 1961 when Mary baby-sat for ANNA - and that was way before Stanley Ann could have had a baby, because that child was conceived before the girl finished high school (if she did, but it’s doubtful) or was not on Mercer Island any more, but in Chicago.
Her only trip to Seattle would have been to pick up little zero, whose parents you don’t know, and show him to Susan Blake, during which visit she told Susan about the kenyan student she had married. And Susan apparently bought it. Which was the way it was intended.
Is that William Ayres I can hear, laughing? By golly, I do think it is...and this is me, the Aussie, saying fare-thee well; learn to love your POTUS, he’s going to be with you for a looong time, fundamentally changing America.
FR won’t let me see your comment on the thread, but I read it on my ping page.
To me, truth is akin to God. Of course, all truths in this mortal realm are temppral, always sometwhat partial or relative; just becasue of individual limitations, the changes of time, the fact that no fallible individual can ever know “everything” and so on.
But still, objective reality aka truth exists. And lies and deceit exist. I’ve said this many times but your comment brings it up in my mind again. If a person thirsts for truth MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE - and has the humility to admit “maybe I don’t know” and is willing to kick out any beliefs, no matter how fondly held, if proven wrong, then that person will know as much truth as it is possible to (in this temporal realm). About that which they want to know the truth.
I also think that FR has been a magnet for some extremely serious malefactors, both professional and lone wolf. The revolutionaries need secrecy, they need the truth about 0bastard’s real history and life completely out of sight and hidden. Why else would Ayers have written “Dreams”? Why the forged documents? Why the hidden educational records? Why the passport breakin? Why the crimes committed at the HI DoH? Why the long list of lies, cover ups, a whole industry actually?
Obviously to cover up the truth. The myth that he is the son of SAD and the Kenyan, was born in HI on such and such a date, and the rest of it - pure fabrication. The whole story is a lie. If anyone is honest, they will say “I don’t know who he is, what his name is, who is mother and father are, where he was born, or when is his date of birth”. And start from there.
Anyone saying that his actual identity doesn’t matter is on the side of lies. It DOES matter. If it didn’t matter, the revolutionaries wouldn’t have made up an entire false identity.
The fact that your comments are ridiculed, vilified, attacked and condemned - and you also attacked personally - shows how dangerous the truth is, to the revolutionaries. Am I saying that everyone on FR who attacks you and your comments is part of the cabal? No, I am not. Some are just loners who are emotionally attached to their personal myths, some may be useful idiots. But I have no doubt whatsoever that some of them are part of the cabal that put him in the WH and want to keep him there.
Anyone who fights for and seeks truth is a hero. The truth is all that matters, nothing else is worth a tinker’s damn.