I think we'll find out more about President Obama after he's out of office, but the man's not going to be impeached. I think that's part of the reason why some conservatives aren't interested in pursuing “Truther” discussions. Pragmatically speaking, no one is going to remove a sitting president from office over the sort of “evidence” that's been presented so far or is likely to be found in the future.
As far as conservative pundits making fun of “Truthers,” some Truthers are nutjobs. Sorry. I've read some Obama eligibility theories that border on the absurd. I thought the Cold Case Posse did good work, but even they didn't say Obama’s documents were definite frauds. They only said the documents appeared fake. That's not conclusive evidence that Obama is ineligible.
Why does anyone have to prove a negative/ I say he isn’t 35 years old. Where is his Birth Certificate? It is that simple. You can’t vote, drive, attend school, etc.. without a BC. Only Obie gets a pass because he is black. The 51% are scared spitless to question this guy. He is a mystery that no one has the guts to check out.
Sort of evidence?..... Are you serious???? The evidence I have seen is overwhelming on several fronts. Instead of implying that the evidence is weak.... Can you give us specific examples where it is flawed?
"""...“evidence” that's been presented so far.....""""
Evidence presented to who???? To You??? Sorry, but so far there has been no congressional investigation nor hearing, and not one court has seen fit to let the judicial process go to even the discovery phase!!! Obama was given a pass and allowed to ignore court subpoenas even after being warned by an attorney general just a few days before not to do so..... I guess you think we should ignore that too.
"""""...I've read some Obama eligibility theories that border on the absurd.""""
Oh really? Again, please be more specific?
""""I thought the Cold Case Posse did good work, but even they didn't say Obama’s documents were definite frauds. They only said the documents appeared fake. That's not conclusive evidence that Obama is ineligible.""""
NOT TRUE!!!! There were two news conferences from Sheriff Arpio's investigation. In the first, the Sheriff concluded that there was probable cause and the documents appeared fake. However, several months later, in the second news conference, the conclusion was that the LFBC that was presented on the official government web site was a digital fabrication and could not possibly be a true scanned copy of Obama's Birth Certificate.
You may appeal to low information voters when you misrepresent the facts but not us here at Free Republic.
Who are you????
I think it is a fine line ,if the a/line exists at all, to say and recognize something as a ‘fake’ versus saying such is not a ‘fraud’ when talking in the public domain.