[Fred Nerks]

That's Mark she's holding. The darker boy is at least five years old.

That's Ruth with Mark, a still from a video in which Mark shows the interviewer through a photo album. Mark was born in 1965.

And here's the dark child on the right who is five years old in the family group image in Kenya. Who is the boy on the left? It can't be 'David' because the progression of the images shows that the dark boy was born in 1961 and 'David' supposedly came along in 1967.

No one would have bothered to look, until Malik said he grew up with Barack in Nairobi and Barack taught school in Uganda. Shouldn't he have said 'David'?

Now give it a rest, or you'll end up in the 'nutty corner' with butter and myself.

[Seizethecarp]

Missing from the photo montage in the comment to which I am replying is the newly revealed photo from the cover of Mark’s new book which obviously ages the two boys by about 3 years and has Mark’s current face next to the “dark boy” showing clearly that it is Mark who is the “dark boy.”

Note that in numerous past postings Fred Nerks has claimed that the two boys in the studio photos are only months apart in age and that they are Roman and Barry in 1964.

They are obviously the same boys as in the family picture which Fred Nerks claims to depict Mark and Roman circa 1967.

Mark’s narrative is that the family picture is circa 1970 and that he is standing and his brother David is in his mother’s arms.

Note that in the family picture Ruth appears to be in her early 30s consistent with Mark’s narrative that the picture was circa 1970. Ruth looks like a much younger late 20s in her picture with baby Mark taken in late 1965 or early 1966.