Per Fred Nerks:
“...the real Barack Obama grew up in Kenya and they called him ‘David’ - and deliberately misidentified him as Mark in a family photo.”
According to the Mal-Val narrative, “the real Barack Obama” referred to above by Fred Nerks, is claimed the have grown up to be Roman Obama of Guinea (by way of Moscow) whose real father is claimed to be BHO Sr. and whose birth name was supposedly Barack Hussein Obama II, ergo Roman Obama is “the real Barack Obama.”
The recent revelation of the new picture of Mark and David on the cover of Mark’s new book shows direct age progression of Mark and David from Mark’s earlier family and studio pictures of those same boys.
Despite this new photographic confirmation including Mark placing his adult face right next to the photo of his face at approximately age 10 so that you can see it is clearly him, Fred Nerks is pulling the “Who are you going to believe...me or your lyin’ eyes?” routine.
Fred Nerks says above that the boy identified as Mark in the family photos is not Mark but is “the real Barack Obama” (Roman) and that this other son was raised as David in Kenya by Ruth and BHO Sr....and then later became Roman Obama by the time he got to a university in Moscow.
Meanwhile, Fred Nerks insists that POTUS Barry is the boy that Mark consistently identifies as his brother David in the studio pictures of the two boys and that the “dark boy” that Mark says is himself is Roman and that the picture was likely taken near Harvard in the US before BHO Sr. got deported...a year before Mark was born.
But in the family picture with BHO Sr., Ruth Baker and two boys in Kenya, the same baby Fred Nerks says is Barry in the studio pics, Fred Nerks now insists is Mark, not Barry! Nerks says that the older, darker boy is still Roman in all of the pictures.
Yes, Fred Nerks, this Mal-Val narrative is nutty, as you yourself declared! It is intended, ultimately by you, to make possible the claim that Mal and Val are Barry’s parents via the endless ludicrous and unsupported claims up-thread.
The more you get your knickers knotted, the louder and longer you decry my postings over more than two years, the more obvious it becomes there’s something very solid behind the who-are-the-parents question that scares you...terrifies you. Your persistent over-reaction and obsessional need to follow every word I write with an emotional outburst, must only make the reader more curious.
So thank you. It’s the best kind of advertising there is. Almost as good as censorship.
Thanks for the ping. I haven’t been following the discussions lately, so it was very helpful.
I gather that one of our more beloved Freeper/Birthers is under fire for promoting a ‘nutty’ theory. It’s safe to assume, then, that the Mal-Valers are under fire for their psychotic theory, correct? After all, there is at least claimed evidence of frogmen; of Malcolm X as Obama’s father, of Valerie Sarruf as his mother, and of the nonexistence of his half brother, David Ndesandjo, there is NOTHING.
Jack Cashill having adeptly and devastatingly disposed of the ‘Malcolm X as father’ idea, let’s have a look at where the ‘David never existed’ claim stands.
According to Mal-Valers:
David’s brother Mark posts a photo of David on the Net, & this means David never existed.
Mark posts a photo of the same child-David-~three yrs older, posing with Mark, and this means David never existed.
Ruth Ndesandjo consistently affirms that she had a son named David Opiyo Ndesandjo, Mark’s full brother, and this means David never existed.
The Ndesandjos’ neighbors, in extensive interviews, affirm David’s existence, and this means he never existed.
Sally Jacobs, who conducted most of the interviews, affirms David’s existence, and this means he never existed.
David Maraniss, famed for his exhaustive research techniques, affirms David’s existence, and this means David never existed.
The largest newspaper in David’s hometown affirms his life and death, and this means he never existed.
The second largest newspaper in David’s hometown affirms his life and death, and this means David never existed.
Several genealogy sites list David as Mark’s younger brother, and this means David never existed.
No person, not a single one, who actually knew the Ndesandjos has ever claimed Mark never existed. In fact, there is no record of anyone, other than the Mal-Valers, making this claim.
So which is more believable? The frogmen, that at least a couple of people claim see, or David’s nonexistence, which flies in the face of ALL countervailing evidence? [For the record, I don’t believe in the frogmen. However, it is a fact that more evidence, such as it is, has been put forth to argue for their existence than has been put forth in support of the claim that David Opiyo Ndesandjo never existed.
So, which is the nuttier theory?
[And for the record, Seize, of course you never claimed to be an Obot. I don’t know why people are allowed to smear others this way. It’s not conducive to maintaining a fully functional, cohesive conservative community, nor does it serve any good purpose. It’s just a smear, pure and simple.]