Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

Cross-posting:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=11315#11315

To: GregNH; David; LucyT; WildHighlander; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Fantasywriter; philman_36; ...

“The other thing to consider is that David has shown that the UoWA transcripts are fake.”

There is NO evidence that the U of WA transcripts are fake, but there is evidence that some folks don’t know how to assess them and false claims of forgery have been made through inept reading of the WA transcript or intentional deception.

The INS FOIA Wood memo recording what BHO Sr. told Wood on 8/31/61 confirms Stanley Ann’s intent to go to a university in WA in the fall.

The following are cross-corroborations between the U of HI transcripts and U of WA final transcript notations:

1. The U of HI transcripts pick up Stanley Ann’s credits at the U of WA in the fall of 1961 and spring of 1962 and use them towards her BA degree.

2. The U of WA transcripts pick up Stanley Ann’s MA degree work at U of HI.

IMO the claims that the U of WA is forged were based on illogical observations that it didn’t look right for a 1961 transcript, but the final transcript put up by WND was NOT a 1961 transcript but a partially automated, partially typed 1970’s version in its final form which has also been corroborated by a verifiable image of the fully computerized version on the U of WA system which is available through FOIA today and also published by WND, IIRC.

All of the cross-corroborating, verifiable (could be produced in court) documents would have to be forged for the claim of forgery of the U of WA transcript to be true.

FReepers still in doubt might ask themselves why Stanley Ann’s attendance in WA would be forged by anyone when it DESTROYS Barry’s DREAMS narrative and proved that his parents NEVER lived together EVER when combined with the INS FOIA docs. That is extremely damaging to Barry’s falsely constructed persona.

11,315 posted on Monday, April 15, 2013 12:17:23 PM by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from “runway kill zone” mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)


1,065 posted on 04/21/2013 3:24:43 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1064 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

Cross-posting:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=11364#11364

To: Fred Nerks; WildHighlander57; LucyT; Fractal Trader; Flotsam_Jetsome; Cold Case Posse Supporter; ...

“Maraniss definitively states that ‘[Dunham] and Obama and the infant never lived [at 6085 Kalanianole].’ There was no room. The senior Dunhams shared the house with the Pratt family. The Pratt daughter ‘has no memory of the Dunhams’ daughter bringing an infant home.’”

I agree that there is NO evidence that after giving birth Stanley Ann and Barry set foot in Hawaii prior to the fall of 1962 when she returned from spending a year at U of WA. There is NO evidence that BHO Sr. and Ann ever lived together before or after Barry was born, so the foregoing is totally consistent with the Maraniss account. Maraniss is debunking the “happy little family for two years in HI” myth of Dreams.

The 8/31/61 Wood memo records BHO Sr. CLAIMING that his wife (that he named as Ann S. Dunham) was living with her parents. At the time witnesses place Stanley Ann and Barry in Seattle. This INS FOIA document is verifiable evidence of what BHO Sr. CLAIMED, and not what ACTUALLY happened.

Maraniss does NOT dispute that Stanley Ann lived at that address with her parents prior to the marriage reported to INS as being on Feb 2, 1961. Maraniss only disputes that BHO Sr, Ann and Barry ever lived together with her parents.

If Stanley Ann went to Kenya to have the baby between February and August, and then went to Seattle without returning to Hawaii, the Pratt daughter would never remember the Dunham daughter bringing a baby home consistent with what Maraniss states. That could be very telling.

Note also that Maraniss doesn’t say that the Pratt daughter doesn’t REMEMBER the Dunham daughter, but only that she doesn’t remember the daughter bringing a baby home.

Note also that the Pratt daughter doesn’t apparently remember the Dunham daughter being PREGNANT!!! The U of HI officials reported to INS (page 39 dated 4/21/61) that BHO Sr. had married Stanley Ann DUNHAM. Where was she between Feb 2 and late August? That is the question.

11,364 posted on Monday, April 15, 2013 9:22:08 PM by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from “runway kill zone” mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)


1,066 posted on 04/21/2013 3:32:52 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson