Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: WildHighlander57; David
The other thing to consider is that David has shown that the UoWA transcripts are fake. I believe he first pointed that out in this very thread, but makes another more recent post here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905135/posts?page=89#89

11,309 posted on 04/15/2013 7:10:10 AM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11308 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH; David; LucyT; WildHighlander; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Fantasywriter; philman_36; ...

“The other thing to consider is that David has shown that the UoWA transcripts are fake.”

There is NO evidence that the U of WA transcripts are fake, but there is evidence that some folks don’t know how to assess them and false claims of forgery have been made through inept reading of the WA transcript or intentional deception.

The INS FOIA Wood memo recording what BHO Sr. told Wood on 8/31/61 confirms Stanley Ann’s intent to go to a university in WA in the fall.

The following are cross-corroborations between the U of HI transcripts and U of WA final transcript notations:

1. The U of HI transcripts pick up Stanley Ann’s credits at the U of WA in the fall of 1961 and spring of 1962 and use them towards her BA degree.

2. The U of WA transcripts pick up Stanley Ann’s MA degree work at U of HI.

IMO the claims that the U of WA is forged were based on illogical observations that it didn’t look right for a 1961 transcript, but the final transcript put up by WND was NOT a 1961 transcript but a partially automated, partially typed 1970’s version in its final form which has also been corroborated by a verifiable image of the fully computerized version on the U of WA system which is available through FOIA today and also published by WND, IIRC.

All of the cross-corroborating, verifiable (could be produced in court) documents would have to be forged for the claim of forgery of the U of WA transcript to be true.

FReepers still in doubt might ask themselves why Stanley Ann’s attendance in WA would be forged by anyone when it DESTROYS Barry’s DREAMS narrative and proved that his parents NEVER lived together EVER when combined with the INS FOIA docs. That is extremely damaging to Barry’s falsely constructed persona.


11,315 posted on 04/15/2013 9:17:23 AM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11309 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH

Have you or anyone else ever explained how SADO got credits for classes she supposedly never took? It takes a certain amnt of credits to get a degree. SADO is given credit for a semester at the UoHI, then for classes at the UoWA. If she took none of these classes, why was she given credit? She needed a certain number of credits to earn her BA, & w’out the ones she earned originally at the UoHI & the ones from UoWA, she wouldn’t have had nearly enough for the degree.

Is the theory really that she earned credits nowhere, but was given them gratis? If so, what is the evidence? You can’t just say, ‘the transcripts’. The transcripts show she attended classes & earned grades, etc. So there wd have to be some other independent evidence that the UoHI gave her credits she didn’t earn. What exactly is that evidence?


11,325 posted on 04/15/2013 10:26:29 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11309 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH

Let me rephrase my question. If the transcripts are fake, where & when did SADO earn enough credits for a BA from the UoHI?


11,333 posted on 04/15/2013 10:40:39 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson