Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V-shaped UFOs in NM photos
examiner ^ | January 16 2009

Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono

CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: archive; bestphotos; callingartbell; chama; et; itsafreakinbird; jm; jpb; kookfringe; kooks; newmexico; nm; roswell; sightings; superstition; tinfoilhat; ufo; ufoarchive; ukmod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,351 next last


1 posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:29 PM PST by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

thats 21 mega pix resolution?


2 posted on 01/17/2009 1:54:16 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new mexico

Stop boiling your weed in old coffee cans.


3 posted on 01/17/2009 1:55:49 PM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
Original Photo:


4 posted on 01/17/2009 1:56:27 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Means nothing; another group of grany photos!


5 posted on 01/17/2009 1:56:42 PM PST by Colonel Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

We’ins in Cecil County, Maryland have been having the same sightin’s according to the local rag. No pictures though.

http://www.cecilwhig.com/articles/2009/01/13/news/doc496c0551a3bb8610129989.txt


6 posted on 01/17/2009 1:58:16 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Sexual Chocolate Almond Chip with extra Hot Fudge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I think 21 mp should have been 2.1 mp. No way those shots came from a 21 mp camera.


7 posted on 01/17/2009 1:58:57 PM PST by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Bird. Now its an IFO.


8 posted on 01/17/2009 1:59:05 PM PST by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

New government toy under test?


9 posted on 01/17/2009 2:00:51 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (The committed will surely dominate the complacent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

LOOKS LIKE A F-117 STEALTH FIGHTER


10 posted on 01/17/2009 2:01:23 PM PST by keystonemike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DevNet

“CANON CAMERA GETS THE CREDIT

“The camera I used is a Canon Mark 3, 21 megapixel. The speed was 1600 with a 2 gig card. My husband and I did not see anything in the sky while I took photographs. I give credit to the camera for its quality, speed and the high megapixel to have captured something we could not see with our eyes.”


11 posted on 01/17/2009 2:01:50 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: keystonemike

You stated what I was thinking.


12 posted on 01/17/2009 2:03:05 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DevNet

She was shooting a Canon 1Ds II or III? That’s an $8,ooo camera body...almost as rare as UFOs.


13 posted on 01/17/2009 2:05:04 PM PST by Bunkasaurus (I'm indecisive....or am I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

These - http://images.google.com/images?q=Canon+Mark+3&um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&sa=N&imgsz=huge - are pictures taken with a Canon Mark 3.

They look nothing alike.


14 posted on 01/17/2009 2:07:44 PM PST by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Ihave a much better picture - Photobucket
15 posted on 01/17/2009 2:09:00 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

16 posted on 01/17/2009 2:13:45 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

What’s this picture?


17 posted on 01/17/2009 2:14:42 PM PST by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

The Russians got one of ours!


18 posted on 01/17/2009 2:15:39 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
No big deal. Zooms can capture birds that your eye doesn't see.

 

 

19 posted on 01/17/2009 2:15:57 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_shutterbug

“Russian KGB UFO Photos

Bill Futreal on 18 Dec 2007

Well, allegedly these are authentic declassified KGB photos showing a crashed UFO.”


20 posted on 01/17/2009 2:16:42 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Looks like birds. Sheesh.


21 posted on 01/17/2009 2:20:05 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative
UFO captured on high quality digital images by reputable professional observers.


22 posted on 01/17/2009 2:25:32 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

“I can see my house from here!”


23 posted on 01/17/2009 2:26:36 PM PST by JRios1968 (Sarah Palin is what Willis was talkin' about!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Didn’t one of those things take down a plane a day or two ago, in New York?


24 posted on 01/17/2009 2:30:47 PM PST by DYngbld (Aspire to inspire before you expire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
There have been millions of digital cameras sold over the years where all you have to do is point and push a button and perfect picture. Not one clear picture of a UFO. Amazing.
25 posted on 01/17/2009 2:39:07 PM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

All those guys surrounding the UFO, and not a single one of them, over all these years, has decided to become a rich and famous whistleblower/author.


26 posted on 01/17/2009 2:57:08 PM PST by cydcharisse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Bird. Next shot please?


27 posted on 01/17/2009 2:58:08 PM PST by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Jim
Johnny Carson(as Carl Sagan)explains the origin of the term "UFO"
28 posted on 01/17/2009 3:05:46 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Liberal media gloating makes me want to start reloading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

That “craft” looks more like a turkey buzzard.


29 posted on 01/17/2009 3:08:40 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keystonemike

We DO have v-shaped airplanes in our arsenal and have for years. Maybe the aliens are copying our technology?


30 posted on 01/17/2009 3:11:52 PM PST by mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingu
"Bird. Next shot please?"


31 posted on 01/17/2009 3:17:26 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
You gotta believe ;-}


32 posted on 01/17/2009 3:22:46 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
reputable professional observers

*snicker* 

33 posted on 01/17/2009 3:25:24 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

34 posted on 01/17/2009 3:42:40 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Where’s Quix? Happy Saturday night to you!


35 posted on 01/17/2009 3:43:12 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempo

You sound very ignorant of the various whys.


36 posted on 01/17/2009 3:47:39 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mysterio; Las Vegas Dave; doug from upland

Thanks. Some interesting photos.


37 posted on 01/17/2009 3:49:33 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Quix

See my #6. We have had recent episodes with similar sightings.


38 posted on 01/17/2009 3:53:36 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (He will never be my president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

BTW, Chama is really not that far from . . . rum roll . . .

DULCE

and

Los Alamos.


39 posted on 01/17/2009 3:56:33 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keystonemike

They’re not flying the 117’s out of Cannon AFB anymore.


40 posted on 01/17/2009 3:57:05 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Do you think things are intensifying re such?


41 posted on 01/17/2009 3:58:00 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Some interesting links from one of the recent ATS threads I’ve linked to on such:

http://www.robocat.users.btopenworld.com

...

http://www.geoffreylandis.com

...

http://www.conjecturenews.com

...

http://www.ufoconspiracy.com
...

http://www.boblazar.com
...
Sojuzkarta KFA-1000 Camera

http:/www.au.youtube.com


42 posted on 01/17/2009 4:01:53 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Well you know from past discussions that I don’t worry all that much as I know we must always be ready, but I definitely have noticed a trend toward this specific patter of lighting on UFOs that have been spotted that seems to be interesting at the least. And there seems to be an increase in activity. Related to Obama? Certainly makes one think he may have some significance to “somebody”. Thoughts?


43 posted on 01/17/2009 4:03:30 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (He will never be my president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Below, an aerial view of the area where the photos were taken as you leave Chama on Highway 84 heading north toward the Colorado border. Mapquest image.


44 posted on 01/17/2009 4:04:49 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Quix
You sound very ignorant of the various whys.

Well, I for one would love to be Enlightened. 

45 posted on 01/17/2009 4:11:17 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Thanks for your interesting contributions. (BTW- first link is dead)


46 posted on 01/17/2009 4:14:18 PM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo
I like Carl Sagan as Mr. Smith.
47 posted on 01/17/2009 4:18:12 PM PST by uglybiker (1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; doug from upland; Las Vegas Dave; SunkenCiv

Doug F Up . . . about 2-3 or so pages down is a link to a YOUTUBE about antigravity physics you might be interested in.

The following also from this thread:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread421144/pg3

Source of below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.T._Brown

Early and middle years
Brown was born in Zanesville, Ohio; his parents were Lewis K. and Mary Townsend Brown. In 1921, Brown discovered what was later called the Biefeld-Brown effect while experimenting with a Coolidge X-ray tube. This is a vacuum tube with two asymmetrical electrodes. Brown noticed that there was a force exerted by the tube when it was connected to a high-voltage source. This force was not caused by the X-rays, but by this new effect. Later, in 1923, he collaborated with Paul Alfred Biefeld at Denison University, Granville, Ohio. He started a military career afterwards and was involved in a number of science programs.
In 1930 he joined the U.S. Navy and conducted fundamental research in electromagnetism, radiation, field physics, spectroscopy, gravity and other topics. He later worked for Glenn L. Martin and, still later, for the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) and the Office of Scientific Research and Development, headed at that time by Dr. Vannevar Bush. After 1944 he worked as a consultant to the Lockheed-Vega Aircraft Corporation.

Later years
In 1955, Brown went to England, and then France where he worked for La Société Nationale de Construction Aéronautique du Sud Ouest (SNCASO). In 1956, the aviation trade publication Interavia reported that Brown had made substantial progress in anti-gravity or electro-gravitic propulsion research. Top U.S. aerospace companies had also become involved in such research (see United States gravity control propulsion research (1955 - 1974)) which may have become a classified subject by 1957. Others contend Brown’s research simply reached a dead end and lost support. Though the effect he discovered has been proven to exist by many others, Brown’s work was controversial because others and even he himself believed that this effect could explain the existence and operation of unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

Brown was an early investigator of UFOs and in 1956 helped found the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). Though Townsend resigned not long after NICAP was founded, NICAP was an influential force in civilian UFO research through 1970. The organization’s activities drew the attention of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), several high-level officers of which joined the group. Brown’s research has since become something of a popular pursuit around the world, with amateur experimenters replicating his early experiments in the form of “lifters” powered by high-voltage.


an interesting YOUTUBE on nano-stuff:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLvjZ_TTrDM


YouTube explaining antigravity physics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xnh5Nd4DzM


And another here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBhsz3iXgGk


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics

Electrogravitics is a research subject based upon the original work of Nikola Tesla, and hypotheses advanced by Thomas Townsend Brown and Brown’s subsequent extensive experimentation and demonstrations of the effect. The term was in widespread use by 1956.[1] The effects of electrogravity have been searched for extensively in countless experiments since the beginning of the 20th century; to date, other than Brown’s experiments and the more recent ones reported by R. L. Talley[2], Eugene Podkletnov, and Giovanni Modanese, no conclusive evidence of electrogravitic signatures has been found. Recently, some investigation has begun in electrohydrodynamics (EHD) or sometimes electro-fluid-dynamics, a counterpart to the well-known magneto-hydrodynamics, but these do not seem a priori to be related to Brown’s “electrogravitics” .


UNITED STATES GRAVITY CONTROL PROPULSION RESEARCH 1955-1974

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_initiative

American interest in “gravity control propulsion research” intensified during the early 1950s. Literature from that period used the terms anti-gravity, anti-gravitation, baricentric, counterbary, electrogravitics, G-projects, gravitics, gravity control, and gravity propulsion.[1][2] Their publicized goals were to develop and discover technologies and theories for the manipulation of gravity or gravity-like fields for propulsion.[3] Although general relativity theory appeared to prohibit anti-gravity propulsion, several programs were funded to develop it through gravitation research from 1955 to 1974. The names of many contributors to general relativity and those of the golden age of general relativity have appeared among documents about the institutions that had served as the theoretical research components of those programs.[4][5][6] The existence and 1950s emergence of the gravity control propulsion research had not been a subject of controversy for aerospace writers, critics, and conspiracy theory advocates. But its rationale, effectiveness, and longevity have been the objects of contested views.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrofluid

A ferrofluid (from the Latin ferrum, meaning iron) is a liquid which becomes strongly polarised in the presence of a magnetic field.

Ferrofluids are colloidal mixtures composed of nanoscale ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic, particles suspended in a carrier fluid, usually an organic solvent or water. The ferromagnetic nano-particles are coated with a surfactant to prevent their agglomeration (due to van der Waals and magnetic forces). Although the name may suggest otherwise, ferrofluids do not display ferromagnetism, since they do not retain magnetization in the absence of an externally applied field. In fact, ferrofluids display (bulk-scale) paramagnetism, and are often described as “superparamagnetic” due to their large magnetic susceptibility. Permanently magnetized fluids are difficult to create at present.[1]

The difference between ferrofluids and magnetorheological fluids (MR fluids) is the size of the particles. The particles in a ferrofluid primarily consist of nanoparticles which are suspended by Brownian motion and generally will not settle under normal conditions. MR fluid particles primarily consist of micrometre-scale particles which are too heavy for Brownian motion to keep them suspended, and thus will settle over time due to the inherent density difference between the particle and its carrier fluid. These two fluids have very different applications as a result.


FOR the moment . . . dat’s it.


48 posted on 01/17/2009 4:27:32 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Hmmmm .

Sorry.

Checked most of the last batch out. They worked for me.


49 posted on 01/17/2009 4:29:18 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

I’ve learned over the decades . . . that some folks are

terminally immune

to enlightenment.


50 posted on 01/17/2009 4:30:10 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson