Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Creationist
Please show me evidence contrary to what I said.

Your use of the word "proof" suggests that you do not understand how science operates. Nothing in science is "proven". Rather, reasonable conclusions are drown from evidence. In the case of the fossil record, educated inferences are drawn from the appearance and layout of the fossil record. Merely saying "dead bones" does not demonstrate that you have actually analyzed the evidence. You cannot dispute evidence if you have not actually studied it.

Please show me my ignorance of the theory of evolution by my demonstration of evidence. You will not.

You claim that "dead bones" are the total evidence presented for the theory of evolution. That is not true. You are simply wrong.

In a court of law I would win you would lose.

You have not demonstrated this to be the case. Asserting that you are correct does not demonstrate that you are correct.

Your evidence is based upon what if, could have, might be, all circumstantial at best.

Given that you have not demonstrated that you even understand the evidence, I see little reason to trust your claims as accurate.

You do not have a leg to stand on, but Hey faith in your religion of evolution will evolve a leg someday.

The theory of evolution is not a religion. Claiming that it is a religion demonstrates either that you are wholly ignorant of the theory and as such are not qualified to discuss it, or that you are lying and as such are not qualified to discuss it.
24 posted on 10/29/2006 11:59:38 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
Main Entry: sci·ence Pronunciation: 'sI-&n(t)s
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin scientia, from scient-, sciens having knowledge, from present participle of scire to know; perhaps akin to Sanskrit chyati he cuts off, Latin scindere to split

1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2 a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study <the science of theology> b : something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science>

3 a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena :

Seems to me by this definition I do know what science is. There is no I mean no testable method of evolution only fantasy.

You never have anything to say but circular reasoning. You never prove anything only claim that I am wrong without evidence. You claim I do not understand yet every time I prove you wrong. You bash me to make your self feel better. But you have not that is right not given me evidence that dead fossil bones gave birth to anything.

You would make a great politician, using many words and not saying a thing.

25 posted on 10/29/2006 1:05:25 PM PST by Creationist (If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson