It is nothing but election interference. Just like the other cases.
Andrew McCarthy agrees. But he pointed out the jury is only being fed information and instruction from the judge. They will believe what Mercan tells them, I’m sure.
Weinstein is a reference concerning evidence allowed. He was convicted in 2020, the prosecution used (and the judge allowed) tainted testimony not pertaining to his case and is now getting a new trial.
Exactly right
One can only wonder what the payoff is for the judge & DA as they trample upon the justice system.
““But Trump covered that up,”
He’s under no obligation to disclose it in the first place.
Perhaps the author’s mother thinks she’s supposed to advertise everytime she banged a guy on a date when she’s applying for a job?
Yes, but it seems there is an industry that does this. They make better money thru extortion than by printing it in tabloids.
"OFF WITH HIS HEAD!" ( or he will be president!)
I’ve used such language prior - though perhaps not here - and it’s about time someone wrote an analysis of this tack.
I would label it ‘accurate’.
Hope’s testimony showed he lied when he denied knowing anything about it publically in 18 when in fact she was involved in the silencing efforts in 16.
Yes, she mentioned keeping newspapers from Melania on the access Hollywood video (doesn’t she watch tv or listen to the radio?) but she also said Stormy caused Trump just as much concern campaign wise. There are so many that try to absolve this as an either/or situation when it appears to have been both personal and political. One doesn’t negate the other.
Since the judge clearly said Trump can testify, do you expect he will take the stand like he promised early on? Will he give us a Col. Jessup moment? B
This writer needs to fire his mother. She has proven to be an idiot.
If Trump got mugged, he’d be charged with aiding and abetting criminals.
Even Lavrenti Garland’s DOJ, which will punish political opponents for crossing the street, wouldn’t go near this case.