Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cash Flush: GOP Nears $90 Million For Election Funds (Dems Losing $$ Fight BIG TIME!)
Associated Press, via YAHOO! ^

Posted on 06/10/2002 11:36:58 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Republican team of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney is closing in on $90 million raised for the party for this fall's congressional elections. That's nine times the take so far of the marquee Democratic draw, Bill Clinton.

The disparity illustrates the Democrats' need to develop a fund-raising star, besides Clinton, who routinely could raise $1 million or more just by showing up.

If Bush and Cheney continue at their current pace, it sets up a potentially immense financial advantage for Republicans in the November fight over congressional control, experts say.

"If the Republicans beat history and hold the House and retake the Senate, money will be the main reason why," said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist.

With five months of campaigning to go, Bush has raised at least $59.6 million and Cheney at least $8.2 million for Republicans from fewer than 30 events each this year. They are expected to raise at least $20 million for congressional races at a GOP dinner this month in Washington.

As the Clinton administration did, Republicans supplement presidential efforts with fund raising by Cabinet secretaries and White House aides, such as political adviser Karl Rove. First lady Laura Bush also is expected to campaign.

Democrats have their own fund-raisers traveling the country.

They include potential 2004 presidential candidates such as former Vice President Al Gore, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota, House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri, Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman , Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry and North Carolina Sen. John Edwards .

More than a year after he left the White House, however, Clinton remains the Democrats' star attraction. The Democratic National Committee tapped him to headline its highest-profile event in the spring, an April fund-raiser in New York that collected $2.5 million for get-out-the-vote efforts.

The other high-profile Democratic fund-raisers have their own constituencies — Gore retains strong appeal among environmentalists, for example — and together bring in substantial sums, Democratic consultant Gary Nordlinger said.

Still, he said, "Clinton will continue to be a star fund-raiser for the Democrats for many years to come. He's not only tremendously popular among the base, but he's a relatively young man, and he's also a very charismatic man."

Clinton, 55, has received so many requests from candidates and the Democratic Party that he asked them to send a priority list.

He has attended about a dozen Democratic fund-raisers this year. They include a January event that raised about $1.5 million for California Gov. Gray Davis, a $1 million New York fund-raiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in March and a $3 million event for New Jersey Sen. Robert Torricelli last week.

He will raise money this month for Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu and New York Democrats.

"The former president will do what he can — given his busy schedule with his foundation's work, writing his book and giving speeches — to help Democrats get elected this fall," spokeswoman Julia Payne said.

Nordlinger said Clinton's campaigning carries some risk for Democrats, possibly even motivating a constituency sometimes called "broken-glass Republicans" who detest the former president so much they would crawl across broken glass to vote against people he supports.

The current president, meanwhile, seems to campaign for Republicans without getting Democrats too fired up, Nordlinger said.

GOP fund-raiser Haley Barbour said Republicans went years without a star fund-raiser after Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush left office.

In 1993, the GOP took in a record amount by rebuilding the party's small-donor base, Barbour said, and began having significant success with a large-donor program in 1994.

Barbour attributes the GOP's current success to a popular president and vice president, as well as the narrow margins in Congress, low unemployment and relatively high incomes.

He nevertheless predicts record fund raising for both parties.

While the picture varies by campaign, Democratic and Republican Senate candidates were roughly even overall in fund raising through the first quarter. GOP House candidates together had a substantial edge over Democrats, as did national Republican committees.

While the GOP raises more, Barbour said Democrats have their own advantage: unions and groups such as abortion-rights and environmental activists able to get out the vote and run ads to help Democratic candidates.

DNC spokeswoman Maria Cardona said Democrats do not expect to raise more than Republicans and do not need to, for many of the reasons Barbour outlined.

Sabato, however, said money does matter in reaching voters.

"The Democratic Party of 2002 does not want to be known as the Clinton party. It wants to move ahead," Sabato said. "But they still need this man of the past."


TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2002; bush; democrats; election; fundraising; gop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
"The Democratic Party of 2002 does not want to be known as the Clinton party. It wants to move ahead," Sabato said. "But they still need this man of the past."

Oh yes, it does. They worship the man. He is their little idol.

1 posted on 06/10/2002 11:36:59 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
under Clinton and with the media bullhorns and whores,words like liberal,socialist,populist,and carpetbagger were defended as normal and needed. That, of course depends on what words like and, the, and it ,means.
2 posted on 06/10/2002 11:41:23 AM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
......but nobody knows or is allowed to investigate the software for the voting machines that determine the outcome.
3 posted on 06/10/2002 11:42:45 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Don't forget Rudy's fundraising abilities as well...he went out to California to help Bill Simon and bang! he upsets Reardon for the primary...now, if 1 visit helped Bill, imagine what may happen come this fall!
4 posted on 06/10/2002 11:44:10 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
I don't feel like contributing today. ~~~ Wait until you see "Unable to locate server"
I don't have money. ~~~ Help with the fundraiser. Bump the threads, ping your FRiends.
There's plenty of time to donate. ~~~ Bill collectors don't see it that way.
I don't know where to contribute. ~~~ Credit card, mail: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 , Paypal: JimRob@psnw.com
I've got too many other things to do first. ~~~ Don't we all?
I can't contribute much, what's five dollars. ~~~ If everyone contributed one dollar a month, we'd never have a fundraiser again.
The dog ate my credit card. ~~~ Shoot the dog.
Just let me finish freeping. ~~~ BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Don't wait until it's too late. Do it today. Do it now! Before they bring out the cheerleaders! Free Republic is funded solely by us. It's up to us to keep it running. Do your part, contribute if you can. Bump the fundraising threads. Help keep this place alive!

5 posted on 06/10/2002 11:47:49 AM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
As we speak, Terry McAuliffe is out buying him a pack of Depends.
6 posted on 06/10/2002 11:53:57 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
"If the Republicans beat history and hold the House and retake the Senate, money will be the main reason why," said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist.
This idiot apparently can't see beyond his nose. Nothing about how the DEMs kept shooting themselves in the foot!!!

SIGH...

7 posted on 06/10/2002 11:55:23 AM PDT by Toidylop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This is good to read. But these totals do not include the Union money for the Rats, do they?
8 posted on 06/10/2002 11:56:08 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
What has happened to the cash cow, Bill Clinton?
9 posted on 06/10/2002 11:56:12 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The disparity illustrates the Democrats' need to develop a fund-raising star, besides Clinton, who routinely could raise $1 million or more just by showing up.

However, he mostly raised skirts when he showed up.

10 posted on 06/10/2002 11:56:44 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Especially for that thing that cloaked his sins; Janet Reno. Neither Clinton is stumping for her. Only lesbians and a fake president.
11 posted on 06/10/2002 11:58:02 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
So the Republicrats are flush with cash.

Now all they need are principles they're really serious about defending, no matter the cost.

I'm not holding my breath. This is Oldbob Dole's party, after all.

12 posted on 06/10/2002 11:59:32 AM PDT by Hank Rearden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
"He has attended about a dozen Democratic fund-raisers this year. They include a January event that raised about $1.5 million for California Gov. Gray Davis, a $1 million New York fund-raiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in March and a $3 million event for New Jersey Sen. Robert Torricelli last week."

Note the list: 2 known crooks and one stash fund for the whole lot of demoncrap crooks!

13 posted on 06/10/2002 12:01:05 PM PDT by tinacart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toidylop
You're right, of course, about the dems shooting themselves in the foot, but momey IS important in winning an election. The sad truth is that most voters don't have a clue about what's going on in politics, and money allows the candidates to keep hammering home what they want the voters to hear. Awww, you probably knew that, but I just wanted to get in a plea for the RNC to get more donations.
14 posted on 06/10/2002 12:31:31 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Why, Howlin, he's over in Ireland running around with the star of U2 and has a coterie of 40 people accompanying him.
15 posted on 06/10/2002 12:33:30 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
"While the GOP raises more, Barbour said Democrats have their own advantage: unions and groups such as abortion-rights and environmental activists able to get out the vote and run ads to help Democratic candidates."

The difference is that the money for Republicans comes from people who actually CHOOSE to give it to them. The money for dummocrats comes from union members' dues. And many union members belong to their union not because they want to or because their union actually does anything for them, but because in most unionized professions, its, "Join the union, or else."

The demonrats love nothing so much as control and coercion.

16 posted on 06/10/2002 12:38:53 PM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I see the CLYMERS over at the A(ll) P(uke) news rag are trying their best soliciting funds for the RATS!
17 posted on 06/10/2002 12:44:33 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
get-out-the-vote efforts

They just are incapable of using words and phrases that don't cover up what they are doing.
Why can't they say "get out the Democrat vote"?

18 posted on 06/10/2002 12:58:02 PM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
"The Democratic Party of 2002 does not want to be known as the Clinton party. It wants to move ahead," Sabato said. "But they still need this man of the past."

"If the Republicans beat history and hold the House and retake the Senate, money will be the main reason why," said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist.

Democrats have their own fund-raisers traveling the country. They include potential 2004 presidential candidates such as former Vice President Al Gore, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota, House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri, Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman , Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry and North Carolina Sen. John Edwards .

OK, so where is Hillary? Maria Can't-Vote-Well has sold her soul and vote to Hillary Clinton to help payoff campaign debts.

Boy, this makes me want to run out and give money to the Republican party so they can burry these Democrats.

19 posted on 06/10/2002 1:27:09 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Oh yes, it does. They worship the man. He is their little idol.

Not so. He has embarrassed the party and gave into many republican efforts such as welfare reform. They tolerate him only as he is the past president and still can draw $.

20 posted on 06/10/2002 1:36:44 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson