Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush releases $95m to Pyongyang (HUH?)
BBC News Asia-Pacific ^ | 3 April 2002

Posted on 04/08/2002 9:36:19 PM PDT by Backlash042

High Graphics | BBC SPORT>>
Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | AudioVideo |


World Contents: Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia | From Our Own Correspondent | Letter From America |

BBC News Online: World: Asia-Pacific


Wednesday, 3 April, 2002, 12:06 GMT 13:06 UK

US grants N Korea nuclear funds


Hammer and sickle flag in Pyongyang
Pyongyang threatened to pull out of the nuclear deal

The US Government has announced that it will release $95m to North Korea as part of an agreement to replace the Stalinist country's own nuclear programme, which the US suspected was being misused.

Under the 1994 Agreed Framework an international consortium is building two proliferation-proof nuclear reactors and providing fuel oil for North Korea while the reactors are being built.

In releasing the funding, President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors to ensure it has not hidden away any weapons-grade plutonium from the original reactors.

President Bush argued that the decision was "vital to the national security interests of the United States".

Deal under threat

North Korea has repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the agreement in recent weeks.

South Korean solider (l) and North Korean soldier (r) on the Korean border

It has been angered by President Bush's accusation that Pyongyang was part of an "axis of evil" producing weapons of mass destruction.

This annoyance was compounded by Washington's decision to withhold this year's certification that North Korea is keeping its side of the Agreed Framework.

It has systematically refused to allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors into its nuclear facility at the Yongbyon research base north of the capital.

Delayed

Pyongyang has justified its refusals by pointing out that the reactors are way behind schedule.

They were originally expected to have been completed next year, but now construction is not expected to even begin until August.

Another issue is the different interpretations of the inspections' timing.

According to the Framework, North Korea should be fully compliant with IAEA safeguards when "a significant proportion" of the project is completed.

The builders say that will be around May 2005, and given the inspections will take at least three years, this means that North Korea should start admitting inspectors now.

But Pyongyang believes that they should only allow the inspections to start, rather than finish, by that date.

The head of the Non-proliferation Policy Education Centre in Washington, a critic of the Agreed Framework, has warned that even when the new reactors are completed they may not be tamper-proof.

"These reactors are like all reactors, They have the potential to make weapons. So you might end up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire the very weapons we're trying to prevent it acquiring," Henry Sokolski told the Far Eastern Economic Review.




TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: clintonism; communism; communist; dicatorship; foreignaffairs; globalism; globalist; northkorea; nuclear
I'm reading this and the magnitude of it is still mind-boggling -- even for a "conspiracy kook" like myself. What about the "Axis of Evil?" Was it all just a bunch of hot air?

I know many of you don't believe in the existence of a globalist/NWO plan, but I have a hard time believing stupidity alone can account for this.

1 posted on 04/08/2002 9:36:19 PM PDT by Backlash042
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Backlash042
Didn't these starving commie dirtbags threaten to attack us again recently? I say let 'em starve.
2 posted on 04/08/2002 9:38:41 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Backlash042
There really is no other explanation that makes sense. If someone has one, I'd like to hear it. They sure are free with our hard earned tax dollars, aren't they? You're a disappointment, George.
3 posted on 04/08/2002 10:42:31 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat
You're a disappointment, George.

I remember even defending the guy early in his presidency saying "give him a chance". To be honest, GW is nothing more than a figurehead. He merely obeys the wishes of the NWO power brokers who financed him. I just wonder what those guys have on him . . . .


4 posted on 04/09/2002 2:04:37 AM PDT by Backlash042
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson