Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I can't believe that this is an actual issue that has to be addressed by legislation. Does any other country allow non-citizens to vote in their elections?
1 posted on 05/04/2024 9:30:48 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CFW

It is just for the headlines.

The DoJ will just sue them, with our money, and everyone will just go “Ah shucks”.


2 posted on 05/04/2024 9:34:13 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Can non-citizens vote for this?


3 posted on 05/04/2024 9:36:05 AM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Sad that such an amendment is even necessary. Not that it would make much difference as such laws are often ignored.


4 posted on 05/04/2024 9:42:03 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

I’ll bet Joe and his DOJ will sue them and claim it is unconstitutional to not let illegal aliens vote.


5 posted on 05/04/2024 9:57:06 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

I think I heard Syria, Iran and Iraq welcome Jews who are citizens of Israel to vote in their elections. Oh, wait. Guess I was mistaken./SARC


6 posted on 05/04/2024 10:27:20 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Framers understood the risks of direct democracy. Left uses strategically placed abortion ballot issues to increase its turnout. Until we can reduce those process provided risks we must use them too. With well written strategically chosen initiatives and amendments, where allowed, to boost our own turnout. How about initiative to ban state expenditures to illegal aliens for any purposes beyond promptly (defined within) removing them from the state and emergency medical care (for conditions hazarding death with the same prompt period.) with better legalese designed to make it harder to stay or overturn. Big enough election win would inhibit elected state officials from fighting it. If written well enough private challenges would be harder and more expensive to attempt. Feds probably would still try, but you do the best you can and even their resources are eventually finite.


7 posted on 05/04/2024 10:27:20 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Biden/Harris events are called dodo ops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

It really is amazing. The Founders weren’t explicit in saying that only citizens could vote because it was a given. No one could imagine that a noncitizen would legally be allowed to vote.

I wonder what’s next. Maybe there’ll be a push to allow animals to vote.


8 posted on 05/04/2024 10:38:53 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

How racist!!


9 posted on 05/04/2024 10:54:08 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson