<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: whynotsexslaves</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/whynotsexslaves/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:21:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Polyamorous Relationships Rapidly Gaining Gov&#x26;#x2019;t Blessing</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4370497/posts</link>
<description>A Quiet Coastal Revolution &#x26;#x201C;Why only two?&#x26;#x201D; The question, posed six years ago by J.T. Scott, a member of the city council of Somerville, Massachusetts, is at the heart of the debate concerning government recognition of polyamory. Scott and his colleague on the city council were considering a domestic partnership ordinance. The original language of the draft specified a domestic partnership as being &#x26;#x201C;between two people,&#x26;#x201D; according to The Harvard Crimson. Councilor Lance L. Davis paused, saying &#x26;#x201C;something didn&#x26;#x2019;t feel quite right,&#x26;#x201D; reports The Crimson. Scott asked the question: &#x26;#x201C;Why only two?&#x26;#x201D; Davis, in his words, executed a &#x26;#x201C;few simple...</description>
<author>The Daily Caller</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4370497/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:21:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>