<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: washingtonpostlies</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/washingtonpostlies/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:32:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Setting The Record Straight: Medicare Drug Benefit Estimates Unchanged</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1340575/posts</link>
<description>Myth:&#x26;#xA0; Yesterday&#x26;#x2019;s Washington Post story (p A1), headlined &#x26;#x201C;Medicare Drug Benefit May Cost $1.2 Trillion,&#x26;#x201D; is simply wrong.&#x26;#xA0; The article says &#x26;#x201C;the White House released budget figures yesterday indicating that the new Medicare prescription drug benefit will cost more than $1.2 trillion in the coming decade, a much higher price tag than President Bush suggested when he narrowly won passage of the law in late 2003.&#x26;#x201D;&#x26;#xA0; This statement in the first paragraph of the story&#x26;#xA0;is flat wrong.&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;Here are the Facts:&#x26;#xA0;In 2003, President Bush committed to spending $400 billion over the next 10 years (2004 to 2013) to modernize Medicare and...</description>
<author>Republican National Committee</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1340575/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>