<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:17:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The Structural Failures of Windows</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1116752/posts</link>
<description> The Structural Failures of Windows Not quite baling wire By Ryan Hunter: Tuesday 13 April 2004, 08:44 IF YOU READ my coming-out (actually going away from Windows) article, you&#x26;#x27;ll note that it had a heavy letter response, both pro, and con. In the article, I also alleged that Window&#x26;#x27;s architecture is fundamentally flawed, and that was challenged in some of the letters to the editor. It&#x26;#x27;s unfair to make such an accusation without backing it up. Because I have some knowledge of the history of operating systems, I&#x26;#x27;ll now take on the duty of demonstrating the architectural flaws, and...</description>
<author>theinquirer.net</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1116752/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:17:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>