<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: voternullification</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/voternullification/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:19:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Roberts Blows Gay Marriage (Roberts, Not Kennedy Was Critical Here)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3035987/posts</link>
<description>SNIP But that&#x26;#x2019;s not how they came out. The liberal wing of the Court plus Kennedy struck down DOMA, with Roberts dissenting on the issue of standing to sue. Then the Court punted on Prop 8, holding that the plaintiffs (hey, they weren&#x26;#x2019;t a gay couple) didn&#x26;#x2019;t have standing. On the standing issue Kennedy and Roberts were consistent. Kennedy didn&#x26;#x2019;t see a standing problem in either case, Roberts did. Both cases were 5-4. I don&#x26;#x2019;t have the second case in front of me but here&#x26;#x2019;s what I think explains what happened. The liberal wing, voting strategically, didn&#x26;#x2019;t see a standing...</description>
<author>American Prowler</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3035987/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:19:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>