<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: triggeredbywomen</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/triggeredbywomen/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:50:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Why Young Women Moved Left While Young Men Stayed Sane</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4362622/posts</link>
<description>Bill Ackman quote tweeted a graph showing the partisan gap between young men and women almost doubled in 25 years. https://x.com/zarathustra5150/status/2011851505834352809?s=20 Women moved radically left. Men stayed roughly where they were. https://x.com/BillAckman/status/2012003297146912926?s=20 Good question. Most answers I&#x26;#x27;ve seen are either tribal (&#x26;#x22;women are emotional&#x26;#x22;) or surface-level (&#x26;#x22;social media bad&#x26;#x22;). Neither traces the actual mechanism. Let me try. First, notice what Wanye pointed out: https://x.com/xwanyex/status/2011813443209146730?s=20 We&#x26;#x27;ve been told for a decade that men are &#x26;#x22;radicalizing to the right&#x26;#x22; and that this is dangerous. The actual data shows the opposite. Men barely moved. Women moved 20+ points leftward. The story we are...</description>
<author>X (formerly Twitter)</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4362622/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>