<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: thenexplainthistopic</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/thenexplainthistopic/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2009 03:38:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Philosophy Puts Brakes on Simplistic Science</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2356472/posts</link>
<description>Oct 5, 2009 &#x26;#x2014; Three stories touching on philosophy of science were reported recently.&#x26;#xA0; They show that simplistic ideas, and even terms deployed, can be misleading.&#x26;#xA0; That&#x26;#x2019;s why philosophers still have a role in curbing the pretensions of scientists, and clarifying scientific issues and terms lest policy-makers and the public get wrong ideas. Are all invasive species bad?:&#x26;#xA0; We are taught to think that &#x26;#x201C;alien&#x26;#x201D; animals or plants introduced into another country pose a threat.&#x26;#xA0; Often they do, but Mark Davis at New Scientist reminded readers that the honeybee was introduced into the Americas.&#x26;#xA0; He said, &#x26;#x201C;you may be surprised...</description>
<author>CEH</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2356472/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2009 03:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>