<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: taxingpower</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/taxingpower/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:56:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Congress can compel action due to public necessity (Did John Roberts use Laurence Tribe&#x26;#x27;s argument?)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900929/posts</link>
<description>THERE&#x26;#x2019;S PLENTY to be said as a policy matter both for and against the Affordable Care Act, but it&#x26;#x2019;s beyond reasonable debate that it complies fully with the Constitution...[Snip]... The one provision whose constitutionality is questioned is the individual mandate...[Snip] That mandate, too, is constitutional. Congress found that the cost of providing uncompensated care to the uninsured totaled $43 billion in 2008, raising annual premiums for the average family by over $1,000. Suppose Congress had required anyone who received medical care at public expense in 2010 to purchase insurance for 2011 or face a modest increase ($750 per year) in...</description>
<author>Boston Globe</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900929/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:56:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>More Thoughts on Today&#x26;#x2019;s Obamacare Rulings (Courts Now Have Assumed Taxing Power)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900545/posts</link>
<description>...Today&#x26;#x2019;s holding is problematic for many reasons. First, it is a novel holding that threatens to expand the taxing power extensively. It removes the taxing power from the representative branches and places it in the only non-accountable branch, the judiciary. Defenders of the law &#x26;#x2014; from President Obama to Nancy Pelosi to Harry Reid &#x26;#x2014; all insisted that the law they voted for was not a tax. Now, when it is off their desk, the court has retroactively declared it a tax, circumventing the public accountability intended by the Founders and recognized by constitutional law as the major check on...</description>
<author>NRO&#x27;s Bench Memos</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900545/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>