<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: taxesindisguise</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/taxesindisguise/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:08:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>CA: Fees v. Taxes: More Than An Academic Debate - 
The Governor should avoid harming taxpayers&#x26;#x2026;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1559958/posts</link>
<description>Among tax experts and policy wonks, there has always been a debate about what constitutes a &#x26;#x22;fee&#x26;#x22; as opposed to a &#x26;#x22;tax.&#x26;#x22; The general public might have some vague notion of a difference between the two but, more times than not, they just don&#x26;#x27;t care. If a citizen pays a $10 &#x26;#x22;fee&#x26;#x22; for something, that $10 has left his or her wallet just as surely as if they had paid a $10 tax. However, ever since 1978 with the passage of Proposition 13, the distinction between &#x26;#x22;fees&#x26;#x22; and &#x26;#x22;taxes&#x26;#x22; has had a significant legal consequence. Certain vote requirements -- either...</description>
<author>CaliforniaRepublic.org</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1559958/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>