<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: taxeaters</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/taxeaters/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:08:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Moment of Clarity: Madison Wild Wings</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2683856/posts</link>
<description>In a response to my piece entitled, &#x26;#x201C;Taxeaters&#x26;#x201D;, a reader who favored progressive income taxation posed this question back to me: why shouldn&#x26;#x2019;t the top 50% of income earners pay 96% of the taxes? My answer: for the same reason that they shouldn&#x26;#x2019;t have to pick up 96% of the state&#x26;#x2019;s collective bar tab. All knowledge builds upon what you know. That evening, I pondered his question some more and was inspired while enjoying a pub meal that Michelle Obama would ban if she could. And here is the problem with progressive income tax theory played out a fictional place...</description>
<author>Moment of Clarity</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2683856/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x22;TAXEATERS&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2680345/posts</link>
<description>This is serious stuff, the kind that serious people are trying to fix, while unserious people continue to lie, sloganeer, pitch a fit, or just run away. When you students were hauling signs around for the greybeards at Bitch Fair On The Square, your solidarity brothers and sisters probably didn&#x26;#x2019;t tell you that you will have to work past 70 so they can keep on retiring in their 50&#x26;#x2019;s, did they? I didn&#x26;#x2019;t think so.</description>
<author>Moment of Clarity</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2680345/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>TYRANNY OF THE TAX-EXEMPT</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2159712/posts</link>
<description>IT now looks like half of President-elect Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s stimulus package will take the form of &#x26;#x22;tax cuts&#x26;#x22; for 95 percent of all Americans. Yet this wouldn&#x26;#x27;t so much boost the economy as trigger a massive, unhealthy shift in American politics. Under Obama&#x26;#x27;s plan, the majority of American voters would pay no federal income taxes, but would get money from the government instead. That is, these &#x26;#x22;refundable tax credits&#x26;#x22; are basically welfare checks - and Obama&#x26;#x27;s plan would leave the most of us collecting, not paying. A $200 billion giveaway won&#x26;#x27;t do much to get a $14 trillion economy rolling...</description>
<author>NEW YORK POST</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2159712/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:17:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>