<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: socialbiology</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/socialbiology/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:42:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Eugenics &#x26;#x2026; death of the defenceless: The legacy of Darwin&#x26;#x2019;s cousin Galton</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2193284/posts</link>
<description>Eugenics &#x26;#x2026; death of the defenceless The legacy of Darwin&#x26;#x2019;s cousin Galton By Russell Grigg Few ideas have done more harm to the human race in the last 120 years than those of Sir Francis Galton. He founded the evolutionary pseudo-science of eugenics. Today, ethnic cleansing, the use of abortion to eliminate &#x26;#x2018;defective&#x26;#x2019; unborn babies, infanticide, euthanasia, and the harvesting of unborn babies for research purposes all have a common foundation in the survival-of-the-fittest theory of eugenics. So who was Galton, what is eugenics, and how has it harmed humanity?... </description>
<author>Creation Magazine</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2193284/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The God Genome (Book review)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1582364/posts</link>
<description>THE question of the place of science in human life is not a scientific question. It is a philosophical question. Scientism, the view that science can explain all human conditions and expressions, mental as well as physical, is a superstition, one of the dominant superstitions of our day; and it is not an insult to science to say so. For a sorry instance of present-day scientism, it would be hard to improve on Daniel C. Dennett&#x26;#x27;s book. &#x26;#x22;Breaking the Spell&#x26;#x22; is a work of considerable historical interest, because it is a merry anthology of contemporary superstitions.</description>
<author>The NY Times (tip o&#x27;the hat to Ramesh Ponnuru on NRO &#x27;s corner)</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1582364/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>