<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: snakehandlersindrag</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/snakehandlersindrag/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:58:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Charles Krauthammer&#x26;#x27;s Ignorant Essay on Design</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1527149/posts</link>
<description>Charles Krauthammer&#x26;#x27;s syndicated essay against intelligent design ran opposite mine in today&#x26;#x27;s Seattle Times. The piece is full of problems, which Tom Gilson and Lawrence Seldon explore in loving detail here and here. Now I would have framed a couple of points in their otherwise fine analysis a little differently. In one place, Gilson describes agnostic David Berlinski as an ID proponent. It would be more precise to call Berlinski a Darwin skeptic and friendly critic of design theory. Also, Seldon writes that Krauthammer &#x26;#x22;rants about Dover and Kansas ... writing out of ignorance and knocking down a straw man.&#x26;#x22;...</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1527149/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:58:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>