<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: slushfund4ukraine</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/slushfund4ukraine/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 11:33:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>What Would America&#x26;#x27;s Two Greatest Statesmen Think of NATO?</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4064511/posts</link>
<description>As the Cold War wound down in the early 1990s and the threat from the Soviet Union receded, the reason why the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was created disappeared. But bureaucracies die hard, and bureaucratic and political inertia are often hard to overcome. An alliance established to contain the Soviet Union needed a new purpose, and like other going concerns and political organisms, NATO would either expand or die. So it expanded. And it began to expand at the same time that the United States was urging Russia to join the West in a &#x26;#x22;partnership for peace,&#x26;#x22; and to...</description>
<author>American Thinker.com</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4064511/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 11:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>