<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: sinofobstinancy</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/sinofobstinancy/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 03:49:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Cardinal Koch falsely claims &#x26;#x2018;no salvation outside the Church&#x26;#x2019; only applies to Catholics</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/4387656/posts</link>
<description>Cardinal Koch falsely claims &#x26;#x2018;no salvation outside the Church&#x26;#x2019; only applies to CatholicsEven the salvation of those remaining outside the Church &#x26;#x2018;through no grave fault of their own&#x26;#x2019; is effected through the graces of the Catholic Church.Cardinal Kurt Koch has erroneously claimed that the doctrine &#x26;#x201C;no salvation outside the Church&#x26;#x201D; only applies to Catholics who already believe the Catholic Church &#x26;#x201C;points the way&#x26;#x201D; to salvation.In an interview with Koch the day following the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) episcopal consecrations, German theologian Jan-Heiner T&#x26;#xFC;ck asked the cardinal why extra ecclesiam nulla salus (&#x26;#x201C;no salvation outside the Church&#x26;#x201D;) has become...</description>
<author>LifeSite News</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/4387656/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 03:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>(Catholic Caucus, Vanity): The utterly illogical, ahistorical, inconsistent, and hypocritical stance of Leo XIV (aka Prevost) towards the SSPX versus Eastern Orthodox, Protestants, Modernist Germwn bishops, concerning the sacraments and on other issues </title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/4387617/posts</link>
<description>A systematic dissection of the Vatican&#x26;#x2019;s legal framework reveals what independent canonists and traditionalists view as a deep-seated crisis of consistency within modern Catholic governance. When the theological and legal arguments used against the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) are laid bare alongside the treatment of the Eastern Orthodox amd protestants, the structural defense provided by Rome (that it is merely maintaining public order and guarding the sacred nature of the sacramental contract) it effectively implodes under the weight of its own internal contradictions. What remains is a system that appears to onlookers not as a defense of immutable...</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/4387617/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 21:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>