<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: scotusfilibuster</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/scotusfilibuster/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2017 18:12:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>SENATE REPUBLICANS NUKE THE SCOTUS FILIBUSTER</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3542117/posts</link>
<description>Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch is about to become a reality Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell delivered on a key Trump campaign promise yesterday, brushing away an arcane procedural hurdle and in the process clearing the way for the swift Senate confirmation of originalist Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch. It is also the first in what promises to be a long series of crushing major defeats for Democrats in the current Congress who are desperate to placate their increasingly rabid far left-wing base.</description>
<author>Canada Free Press</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3542117/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2017 18:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nuked! Blessed be the Holy Fallout</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3541800/posts</link>
<description>SCOTUS filibuster vaporized as Mitch McConnell holds firm on cloture rule change Wow. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) actually did the right thing for a change. He led the way as Senate Republicans invoked the so-called nuclear option today, voting 52 to 48 on a party-line vote to eliminate the filibuster for nominations to the Supreme Court. Going forward, high court nominees including President Trump&#x26;#x2019;s current pick Neil Gorsuch, will need a simple majority to be confirmed.</description>
<author>Canada Free Press</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3541800/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:22:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In Praise of Supreme Court Filibusters - A view from beyond partisanship.


</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2281443/posts</link>
<description> June 25, 2009, 4:00 a.m. In Praise of Supreme Court Filibusters A view from beyond partisanship. By John O. McGinnis &#x26;#x26; Michael B. Rappaport With every recent Supreme Court nomination, senators and commentators have debated whether it is appropriate for senators to filibuster nominees. With a dreary predictability, Democratic senators argue in favor of the appropriateness of filibusters only when Republicans nominate justices and Republican senators argue in their favor only when Democratic presidents nominate justices. In Washington, constitutional provisions and desirable procedures often mysteriously change their meaning with every election, as each party molds rules to its partisan...</description>
<author>National Review Online</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2281443/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>