<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: sb867</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/sb867/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Governor vetoes collective bargaining for child-care workers</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1989439/posts</link>
<description>Legislation to grant collective bargaining rights to grandmas, aunts and other subsidized child-care providers was vetoed Thursday by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Senate Bill 867 targeted a pivotal service for low-income parents, with about 90,000 providers assisting 700,000 families at a public cost of more than $3 billion. Schwarzenegger&#x26;#x27;s veto message cited the state&#x26;#x27;s massive budget deficit, which despite recent trims is pegged at $8 billion. &#x26;#x22;Given California&#x26;#x27;s significant budget challenge, I cannot consider bills that would add significant fiscal pressures to the state&#x26;#x27;s structural budget deficit,&#x26;#x22; he wrote. SB 867, similar to legislation vetoed last year, was sponsored by the...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1989439/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Daniel Weintraub: Unionizing family day care would hurt the poor</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978093/posts</link>
<description>Don&#x26;#x27;t look now, but the Democrats in the California Legislature want to unionize Grandma. Really. A bill pending in the Senate would create a union to organize family members who provide child care for their kin and are paid by the state so that mothers can work outside the home. The measure already has passed in the Assembly. The child care providers &#x26;#x2013; grandparents, aunts, uncles and siblings &#x26;#x2013; would pay dues and be represented collectively in negotiations with the state over pay, benefits and working conditions. Child care providers who did not want to join the union would still...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978093/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>