<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: raisinlaw</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/raisinlaw/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:36:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>SCOTUS justices face off over &#x26;#x201C;ridiculous&#x26;#x201D; raisin law, property rights</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3282257/posts</link>
<description> Jazz Shaw referenced a case this week we&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x20AC;&#x26;#x2122;ve been watching at HotAir since it was argued the first time, on more narrow grounds, at the Supreme Court a couple years ago. The question at the heart of this round of oral arguments on an archaic raisin regulatory regime: Can the government confiscate substantial parts of a farmer&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x20AC;&#x26;#x2122;s crops in a bid to keep the prices of that crop stable as part of a long-ago established regulatory structure, without paying the farmer. The Hornes of California disobeyed the government&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x20AC;&#x26;#x2122;s orders to give over the literal fruits of their labors and...</description>
<author>Hotair</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3282257/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:36:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>