<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: racistsexist</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/racistsexist/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:32:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Chicago Paper Runs Racist-Sexist Headline In Election Coverage: &#x26;#x201C;&#x26;#x2026;Make The Chamber A Little ....&#x26;#x201D;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2434944/posts</link>
<description>The Chicago Reader is running a spread on the candidates vying for the Democrat nomination for Obama&#x26;#x2019;s former Senate seat. The title of the article is quite offensive: readertitle2 What&#x26;#x2019;s at Stake in the Senate Not only could a Democrat help push Obama&#x26;#x2019;s agenda &#x26;#x2013; he or she could make the chamber a little more black, female, gay, or righteous. This is what makes some of us disgusted with Progressive Democrats and their media lap dogs. How is the title of this article in any way true to the spirit of the following quote:</description>
<author>Big Journalism</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2434944/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>