<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: quiteadilemma</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/quiteadilemma/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:21:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>&#x26;#x27;He will destroy the Democratic party&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2345943/posts</link>
<description>This Washington Post story captures the stark divide over Afghanistan, with a unified military command on the one side &#x26;#x2014; including McChrystal, Mullen, and Petraeus &#x26;#x2014; and a president who is not sure he wants to follow through on &#x26;#x22;the counterinsurgency strategy he set in motion six months ago&#x26;#x22; on the other. There&#x26;#x27;s this anonymous quote from one observer: &#x26;#x22;He can send more troops and it will be a disaster and he will destroy the Democratic party. Or he can send no more troops and it will be a disaster and the Republicans will say he lost the war.&#x26;#x22; Isn&#x26;#x27;t...</description>
<author>nationalreview.com</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2345943/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>