<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: phonetax</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/phonetax/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:32:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Phone tax gets heavy backing from unions</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1959703/posts</link>
<description>The campaign for a $243-million telephone users tax on the Feb. 5 ballot has amassed nearly $2.6 million, almost three-fourths of it from labor unions... Unions provided nearly $1.9 million to the Proposition S campaign, which is seeking to preserve a tax on cellular and land line calls that has been challenged repeatedly in court. The size of the donations appalled foes of the tax, who said that city employee unions were rewarding politicians for giving them raises -- and ensuring that more will be granted in the future. &#x26;#x22;This is the economics of special interests,&#x26;#x22; said Walter Moore, who...</description>
<author>Los Angeles Times</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1959703/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mayor maneuvers to get phone tax on Feb. 5 ballot (Los Angeles)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1905457/posts</link>
<description>Worried that an upcoming court ruling could wreak havoc on the city budget, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa recommended Monday that the City Council declare the city will face an &#x26;#x22;emergency&#x26;#x22; if a court rules against the city and invalidates a $270-million telephone users utility tax. The declaration would pave the way for the mayor and the council to put a replacement tax on the ballot as soon as Feb. 5 and -- perhaps more significantly -- lower the threshold needed to win passage of such a measure from two-thirds to a simple majority, lawyers for the city said. Villaraigosa...</description>
<author>LA Times</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1905457/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CA: Hospital ballot drive loses key group (Phone Tax)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114212/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;The trade group for California hospitals withdrew its support Wednesday for a proposed ballot measure that would tax phone bills to fund emergency room services, leading some proponents to question its chances on the November ballot.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;Jan Emerson, spokeswoman for California Healthcare Association, said the group pulled its support for the initiative because recent internal polling found voters &#x26;#x22;would not support anything on the ballot that they perceived to be a tax.&#x26;#x22;&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114212/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Apr 2004 06:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Phone fund comes under scrutiny:</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/909841/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;EW YORK -- Considering all the extra charges on phone bills, the Universal Service tax might seem minor.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;Its reach is big, however: It covers the high cost of making it possible for Americans to talk from mountains, swamps, and other remote areas. It subsidizes phone bills for poor people and technology at schools and libraries.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>AP</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/909841/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 09:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California: State plans to tap special phone funds</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/734929/posts</link>
<description>SACRAMENTO &#x26;#x2013; A stalled state budget would take $278 million from two funds financed by fees on monthly telephone bills, a shift that alarmed phone companies and prompted a consumer group to call the plan &#x26;#x22;stealing.&#x26;#x22; The regulatory agency that oversees the funds, the Public Utilities Commission, found it had a surplus after being asked by the Legislature to help find ways to close a record $23.6 billion budget gap. &#x26;#x22;There is a surplus in the fund, and we provided that data,&#x26;#x22; said Loretta Lynch, the commission&#x26;#x27;s president. &#x26;#x22;It&#x26;#x27;s a policy call that the Legislature is entitled to make in...</description>
<author>San Diego Union-Tribune</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/734929/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>